On Thu, Aug 13 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Yes, dpkg, apt-get, aptitude and synaptic all work perfectly fine.
The debug command addresses my concerns here.
> As I've said, there will still be a debug archive. I don't see what's
> the problem with providing *both* an archive and a share, really. If
> you can't use the latter, that's fine, use the packages.
Oh, that's good, then.
> Furthermore, we could expand dpkg-gencontrol to accept a --extension
> option, so that you don't need to look for the package version and
> arch.
That would be really nice.
So, at this point, I have a somewhat pedantic issue with calling
the same package format with two names (.deb and .ddeb), but this is
mostly aesthetics, and not a real technical objection.
manoj
--
It is impossible to make anything foolproof, because fools are so
ingenious.
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
