On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> How does this compare with projects like icheck or abicheck?
icheck is fairly unmaintained, since upstream is a former Debian developer.
No idea about abicheck, perhaps you could compare them Andrey?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/P
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:26:02AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> >
> > (filterdiff comes with patchutils.) Given that, this seems like a tempest
> > in a teapot to me. Just convert the diff into whatever format the tool
> > that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mikhail Gusarov
* Package name: python-ampqlib
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Barry Pederson
* URL : http://barryp.org/software/py-amqplib/
* License : LGPL 2.1+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Simple non
Hi Jonas,
On Donnerstag, 6. August 2009, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> at least for zope2.1[01]-sandbox, i don't know how to fix that issue.
> invoking the initscript at postinst/prerm of the -sandbox packages will
> cause _all_ zope instances on the system to be restarted, and that isn't
> an option at a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: akonadi-googledata
Version: 1.0
Upstream Author: Adenilson Cavalcanti
URL: http://code.google.com/p/libgcal/
License: LGPL3
Description: Google calendar and contacts resource for Akonadi
It provides an ea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: at-spi2-core
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Mike Gorse
Mark Doffman
* URL : https://projects.codethink.co.uk/index.php/p/at-spi2
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the emdebian-tools package.
For my reasons, see:
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/serendipity/index.php?/archives/178-Why-I-missed-DebConf9.html
For background, see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2009/08/msg5.html
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Giving a standard interface to reviewers is a laudable goal, but I do not see
> reviewers except in elaborate scenarios about security. Therefore I will not
> trade a real benefit for a hypothetical one, even if both are neglectible.
Hi,
as announced yesterday, I will now continue starting threads about different
bug categories detected by piuparts, with the aim to agree on mass filing
bugs with a sensible severity.
Today I picked another simple category: packages which failed the piuparts
test because the package tries to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: at-spi2-atk
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Mike Gorse
Mark Doffman
* URL : https://projects.codethink.co.uk/index.php/p/at-spi2
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
D
Ray Wang (07/08/2009):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Ray Wang
>
>
> * Package name: at-spi2-core
> Version : 0.1.0
> Upstream Author : Mike Gorse
> Mark Doffman
> * URL : https://projects.codethink.co.uk/index.php/p/at-spi2
> * L
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the apt-cross package.
For my reasons, see:
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/serendipity/index.php?/archives/178-Why-I-missed-DebConf9.html
For background, see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2009/08/msg5.html
and f
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 11:04 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> The package description is:
> apt-cross is intended to make it easier to locate, download, install and
> update your cross-compiling libraries, directly from the Debian archives.
I'm interested to help on this, but I'm still waiting for
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 14:21:54 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Banck (05/08/2009):
> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:15:22AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > And for the format of the patch, I do not know what to tell them
> > > apart that unified diff is the preferred format of some Debian
Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 18:38:41 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>
>> Colleagues, I'm software engineer from Institute for System
>> Programing of Russian Academy of Sciences and we are developing a free
>> lightweight tool for checking backward/forward binary c
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:57:38PM +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> 2) icheck was intended for the same purposes as an
> ABI-compliance-checker, but icheck has many drawbacks:
[...]
> c) icheck contains 467 files and 61 sub-folders;
> ABI-compliance-checker is a single file.
I am concerne
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Watson
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-lamson
Version : 1.0pre1
Upstream Author : Zed Shaw
* URL : http://lamsonproject.org/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Descrip
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Le Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:26:02AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> >
>> > (filterdiff comes with patchutils.) Given that, this seems like a tempest
>> > in a teapot to me. Just convert the diff into wh
Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Giving a standard interface to reviewers is a laudable goal, but I do not see
>> reviewers except in elaborate scenarios about security. Therefore I will not
>> trade a real benefit for a hypothetical one, e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ryan Kavanagh
* Package name: turnin-ng
Version : 1.0~rc1
Upstream Author : Ryan Kavanagh
* URL : http://github.com/ryanakca/Turnin-NG/tree/master
* License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Assign
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Watson
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-mock
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Michael Foord
* URL : http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/mock/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Py
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:57:38PM +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>
>> 2) icheck was intended for the same purposes as an
>> ABI-compliance-checker, but icheck has many drawbacks:
>>
>
> [...]
>
>
>> c) icheck contains 467 files and 61 sub-folders;
>> ABI-c
On Thu, Aug 06 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
> This said, if there were a project-wide momentum for standardising on one
> patch
> format, I would not oppose. This would probably be a release goal, a
> preparation for a Policy change, or a demand from the security team to the
> package manintainer
On Fri, Aug 07 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Today I picked another simple category: packages which failed the piuparts
> test because the package tries to overwrite another packages files without
> declaring a conflict or replaces relation. See policy 7.4 and 7.6 at
> http://www.debian.org/doc
Hi Manoj,
On Freitag, 7. August 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Today I picked another simple category: packages which failed the
> > piuparts test because the package tries to overwrite another packages
> > files without declaring a conflict or replac
Le dimanche 26 juillet 2009 à 13:51 +0200, Luca Falavigna a écrit :
> waf preferred design is to provide a self-unpacking Python script to be
> installed into projects' root directories and then executed from there,
> we adjusted it to be available system-wide, so everyone can use it, no
> matter i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy
Package name: samtools
Version : 0.1.5c-1
Upstream Author : Heng Li, Bob Handsaker, Jue Ruan, Colin Hercus.
URL : http://samtools.sourceforge.net/
License : MIT and NetBSD
Programming Lang: C, Perl
27 matches
Mail list logo
