On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Giving a standard interface to reviewers is a laudable goal, but I do not see
> reviewers except in elaborate scenarios about security. Therefore I will not
> trade a real benefit for a hypothetical one, even if both are neglectible.
> Also, I think that it is very important in a project of 1,000 persons to stick
> to facts, and avoid building illusions together. So as long as there is no
> reviewing process nor package reviews, there is no need to adapt to imaginary
> reviewers.
>
/me raises his release team hat.
Neil
--
* Tolimar votes for debconf7 to be somewhere where he speaks the
language.
<Tolimar> That would a veto for switzerland ;)
<Ganneff> Tolimar: that also vetos germany
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
