Pierre Habouzit <madco...@madism.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >> Le Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:26:02AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : >> > >> > (filterdiff comes with patchutils.) Given that, this seems like a tempest >> > in a teapot to me. Just convert the diff into whatever format the tool >> > that you're using expects or the reviewer wants to read. >> >> Hi Russ and everybody, >> >> I already explained that I prefered that the patch stays in the original >> format > > Then you'll need to write your "own" patch system that calls patch(1) to > apply the patches, à la cdbs-simple-patchsys.
Why should he need to do that? If you'd had written "submit patches to dpkg", I could get a meaning out of it, but here? He doesn't want to diverge from upstream. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org