Hello,
some quick look into the packages files I found out that (at least)
four different ways to notate bullet lists in long descriptions.
Developers us '-', '+', '*' or '=' signs to mark the beginning of
some list (that whould have been an \begin{itemize} in LaTeX or
in HTML). The intention a
[Andreas Tille]
> Hi,
>
> I'm just forewarding the answer of upstream about the possibilities
> for the bootstrapping process ...
>
> Any comments?
I would suggest you ask upstream to include a set of generated files
in the upstream tarball, to make it possible to bootstrap the tarball
using a C
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:22:17AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On the other hand
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/ht
> is perfectly formatted on the web pages. It seems to be according
> to the fact that parts of the description where a line starts with
> two spaces are wrapped into tags
Hi!
I just asked in debian-dpkg, but think it better fits here.
I built a source-package for module-assistant for a driver needed on boot.
Now I'm searching for a way to re-invoke module-assistant on
kernel-upgrades.
My first try was to add a hook to initramfs-tools that launches
module-ass
> "Michael" == Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Since it seems to generate makefiles, I suggest Automake :-)
>>
>> But, slightly more seriously "mentioning" Gnu Make might also
>> be a possibility: e.g. gmbuild or mkbuild or makebuild or
>> mfbuild.
Hi all,
I am a member of debian mirror administration team in Japan.
I announce I start cdn.debian.net.
At 2008-Feb-05, we had started "cdn.debian.org" on global Debian Mirrors.
This CDN checks your hosts DNS query to retrive your national location.
- If your located country has Debian Mirror,
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 11:26 +0100, Patrick Scharrenberg wrote:
> So, what is the best practice to recompile kernel-modules on
> kernel-upgrades?
> Any thoughts?
What about postinst_hook in /etc/kernel-img.conf ?
manpage say's "... A script to be executed during installation after all
the symboli
Franklin PIAT schrieb:
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 11:26 +0100, Patrick Scharrenberg wrote:
So, what is the best practice to recompile kernel-modules on
kernel-upgrades?
What about postinst_hook in /etc/kernel-img.conf ?
manpage say's "... A script to be executed during installation after all
On Sunday 17 February 2008 12:11:18 pm Franklin PIAT wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 11:26 +0100, Patrick Scharrenberg wrote:
> > So, what is the best practice to recompile kernel-modules on
> > kernel-upgrades?
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> What about postinst_hook in /etc/kernel-img.conf ?
> manpage s
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du dimanche 17 février 2008, vers
11:53, ARAKI Yasuhiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Technology and Codes:
> At first, CDN find requester IP's location by Max-mind DB.
> Max-mind DB is same DB file for geoip-bin.deb package.
> At 2nd, CDN checks nati
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:08:39PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> I just try with host:
> cdn.debian.net is an alias for deb.cdn.araki.net.
> deb.cdn.araki.net has address 61.115.118.67
> deb.cdn.araki.net has address 133.5.166.3
> deb.cdn.araki.net has address 133.5.166.3
> deb.cdn.araki.net ha
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I would suggest you ask upstream to include a set of generated files
in the upstream tarball, to make it possible to bootstrap the tarball
using a C compiler instead of requiring a M compiler. It could then
as the normal build first build the M co
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du dimanche 17 février 2008, vers
13:58, William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> 61.115.118.67 is ftp.de.debian.org. I am located in France with an
>> IP address of one of the largest ISP here. This ISP is hosting an
>> official Debian mirror.
> 6
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du dimanche 17 février 2008, vers
13:46, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> 61.115.118.67 is hanzubin.st.wakwak.ne.jp. I think the whole lists
> you show there are Japanese servers. ftp.de.debian.org is 141.76.2.4
> which is the one I get while being
[Andreas Tille]
> Well, if I understood K.S. Bhaskar's last mail right this might be
> possible in theory but would require a certain amount of extra work
> for them which they are not willing to do because it has no profit
> for their work.
I only read that they were against spending time to wri
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Simon Huggins wrote:
Yes.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Description
The others are probably bugs then. Do you have a list to name and
shame?
Ahh- shame on my first for missing this. ;-)
For a quick shot I used:
grep -B13 -A1 "^ [^
Hi Vincent,
Thank you for your testing.
Do you like cdn.debian.net's idea and implementation?
I would like you to notice your impression for cdn.debian.net to me!
If possible, I hope you to update EU/Fr mirror list for cdn.debian.net
in near future. (please see last part of this mail..)
At Sun,
Dne Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:46:47 +0100
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:08:39PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> >
> > I just try with host:
> > cdn.debian.net is an alias for deb.cdn.araki.net.
> > deb.cdn.araki.net has address 61.115.118.67
> > deb.cdn.araki.ne
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 13:08 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> 61.115.118.67 is ftp.de.debian.org. I am located in France with an
> IP
> address of one of the largest ISP here. This ISP is hosting an
> official
> Debian mirror.
61.115.118.67 is assigned to ASNIC, so there is no possible way i
[No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Keeping the other CCs since I don't
know about their subscription status.]
Hi
ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> I announce I start cdn.debian.net.
You could have announced work on this before, we could have joined
forces! :-)
But I wonder, how do you guys deal with pa
Dear developpers,
following the discussion on patch systems and standardisation, here is
the wishlist but I sent to the cdbs package. (#466259)
I hope that it can lead to some progress…
Have a nice day,
-- Charles Plessy
- Forwarded message from Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Da
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008, David Paleino wrote:
> > We’ve always done this way in pkg-gnome’s SVN, keeping only debian/
> > directories, while using simple-patchsys, dpatch, dbs (muahaha) and now
> > standardizing on quilt.
>
> ... and? Something's missing: do you use svn-do?
I wrote it for pkg-gnome
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:35:08PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> [No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Keeping the other CCs since I don't
> know about their subscription status.]
>
> Hi
>
> ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> > I announce I start cdn.debian.net.
>
> You could have announced work on th
Dear Debian developers,
My team have been developing a software for my company since 2004, now I
have plan to release it to the public, hopefully in an open source
license if the management board doesn't object. So I need the peer
reviews from the community of the quality of the software, if it
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080215 11:46]:
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:42:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> > This is a very good idea, but the reason why source-only uploads are
>> > not allowed is that there are concerns that if the binary package is
Am Sonntag 17 Februar 2008 schrieb namnd:
> In this case, the configuration is as easy as:
>
> password="***"/>
>
>
The ppp stanza should not contain authentication information. Especially since
username/password only covers the most simple authentication method. And
other parts could us
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:35:08PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> > - If your located continent has Debian Mirror, return this mirror
> > site IP address.
>
> I don't think this is a good logic for many situations.
> For instance: Brazil is in South America, but it doesn't have good links
>
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 09:17:44 +, Simon Huggins wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:22:17AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On the other hand
> > http://packages.debian.org/sid/ht
>
> > is perfectly formatted on the web pages. It seems to be according
> > to the fact that parts of the d
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:20:48PM +0700, namnd wrote:
>
> * The configuration file is in XML so netupdown can handle sophisticated
> configuration. Editing the XML the configuration by hand or by software
> will be easy and comfortable.
Forgive me, but "yeah right!" Have you ever actually edi
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
* The configuration file is in XML so netupdown can handle sophisticated
configuration. Editing the XML the configuration by hand or by software
will be easy and comfortable.
Forgive me, but "yeah right!" Have you ever actually edited XML by
hand? Try tweaking a
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:20:48PM +0700, namnd wrote:
> * The configuration file is in XML so netupdown can handle sophisticated
> configuration. Editing the XML the configuration by hand or by software
> will be easy and comfortable.
Editing XML by hand "easy and comfortable"?!?
In which wo
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Sonntag 17 Februar 2008 schrieb namnd:
In this case, the configuration is as easy as:
The ppp stanza should not contain authentication information. Especially since
username/password only covers the most simple authentication method. And
other parts co
On Sunday 17 February 2008 15:41, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> [Please respect the Reply-To header]
>
> In order to bring some more QA on the watch files subject I'd like to start
> a permanent MBF on packages whose Debian upstream version (the version
> string from Version: without the
Hello all,
[Please respect the Reply-To header]
In order to bring some more QA on the watch files subject I'd like to start a
permanent MBF on packages whose Debian upstream version (the version string
from Version: without the epoch and the Debian revision) is higher than the
latest upstream
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
It is part of the base system. And people will have to manipulate it
even when the web interface is not available. Think of using globs and
stats. Also think of creative usages of symlinks.
Well, I guess that it is up to me to "think" (demonstrate fisibility)
here. Otherwise
Hello,
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Rationale: the watch files are meant to keep track of upstream and if there's
> a newer version not being reported by the watch file it means that it needs
> to be fixed.
>
> Please note that this situation often occurs when the maintainer
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> And it looks to me like the mirror should also be available via
> "/debian".
Oh-oh... I hadn't thought about this problem too.
Well, I guess it's something that could be asked of the local
mirror-admin. If they want their mirror to be a part of the automatic
rotation they cou
Hello,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Rationale: the watch files are meant to keep track of upstream and if
>> there's a newer version not being reported by the watch file it means
>> that it needs to be fixed.
>>
>> Please note that this situ
Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> On Sunday 17 February 2008 13:41:34 Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> If nobody objects I'll start filling (in an automated way since there are
>> no false positives) reports on the 307 source packages which report a
>> Debian upstream version higher than Upstream version by t
On Sunday 17 February 2008 13:41:34 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> If nobody objects I'll start filling (in an automated way since there are
> no false positives) reports on the 307 source packages which report a
> Debian upstream version higher than Upstream version by the watch file.
I don't know wha
On Sunday 17 February 2008 17:22, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Sunday 17 February 2008 15:41, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >> Please note that this situation often occurs when the maintainer didn't
> >> make the watch file strip some +VCSrevN that was added to the Debian
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Sunday 17 February 2008 15:41, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>
>> Please note that this situation often occurs when the maintainer didn't
>> make the watch file strip some +VCSrevN that was added to the Debian
>> Version.
>>
>> If nobody objects I'll start filling (in an
Hi,
On 2/18/08, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:35:08PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> > [No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Keeping the other CCs since I don't
> > know about their subscription status.]
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> > > I ann
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 09:57 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> There are three things you can do:
>
> 1) Do nothing.
>
> Once you have packages GT.M Debian will have a GT.M and you can
> Build-Depend on it for future builds.
>
> Big problem with this approach is that if the GT.M package ever b
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In order to bring some more QA on the watch files subject I'd like to
> start a permanent MBF on packages whose Debian upstream version (the
> version string from Version: without the epoch and the Debian revision)
> is higher than the latest upstream
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Sunday 17 February 2008 17:22, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>
>> If Debian's 0.11+1-1 is upstream's 0.11 why not just strip the '+1' using
>> dversionmangle?
>> That's in my POV the bug.
>>
> I think rewriting watch files for one time events is a mistake. If this
> were
> a
Hello everybody,
[Please respect the Reply-To header]
More than one month ago I posted a list[1] of packages defining useless
rpath's on amd64 based on an archive wide lintian check.
I just finished an other archive wide lintian check in order to track the
progress made on the subject. Here are
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:55:26 -0600 Raphael Geissert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Sunday 17 February 2008 17:22, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>>
>>> If Debian's 0.11+1-1 is upstream's 0.11 why not just strip the '+1'
using
>>> dversionmangle?
>>> That's in my POV the bug.
>
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>gnubg
>
> Upstream stopped doing real releases a while back although hopefully will
> again do some someday. Currently, all that's available is nightly
> snapshots. I can:
>
> * Keep
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Upstream stopped doing real releases a while back although hopefully
>> will again do some someday. Currently, all that's available is nightly
>> snapshots. I can:
>>
>> * Keep pointing the watch file at the actual official re
Hello,
The current maintainer of gtkglext has not been maintaining the package
since 2004. The last upload was in 2006 to fix an NMU, which has not
been acknowledged yet. The current package is two major versions out of
date (1.0 vs 1.2).
I need a newer version of gtkglext for various projects I
On Feb 18, 2008 8:49 AM, Yasuhiro Araki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because cdn.d.n uses DNS query only. Then cdn.d.n can not detect architecture.
> If possible, we can make CDN for each architecture (cf. cdn-i386.d.n).
Already solved, see:
-geomirror.debian.net
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> appears to be MIA, and most of
his packages have been NMU'd. You may want to consider orphaning them.
I have prepared an upload for gtkglext, so that one can be considered
under my maintainership "really soon now".
William
signature.asc
Descriptio
> "namnd" == namnd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
namnd> To be short, I consider my software "an evolution of ifupdown", so
the
namnd> main part is called "netupdown", the purpose of this software is to
namnd> use on corporate internet gateway, the main features of the software:
Ha
also sprach namnd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.17.1720 +0100]:
> My team have been developing a software for my company since 2004,
> now I have plan to release it to the public, hopefully in an open
> source license if the management board doesn't object. So I need
> the peer reviews from the c
> Hi Subrata,
>
> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 14:07 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Can somebody direct me to the appropriate mailing list, where this can
> > be taken forward ?
> >
>
> For Debian, the kdump automation support seems is still not in place
> yet. In order to run this test suite, a user
Hello Martin,
Hello Nam,
I am the author of netconf (http://netconf.alioth.debian.org), which
Brian has already introduced in another post to this thread. I am
very interested in your work because all the issues you highlight in
your mail are core to my motivations for writing netconf.
You are
So, what is the best practice to recompile kernel-modules on
kernel-upgrades?
The current best practice is definitely to rely on users' memory :S
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=299727 for some
discussion about this. A few hacky ideas were proposed. I don't expect
to see a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mario Limonciello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gmyth
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author :
Alexsandro Jose Virginio dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hallyson Luiz de Morais Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Leonardo Sobral Cunha <[EMAIL PROTECTE
---
meena rawat wants to stay in better touch using some of Google's coolest new
products.
If you already have Gmail or Google Talk, visit:
http://mail.google.com/mail/b-5f3142915c-22450b56df-0ba62ebf95e9d458
You'll need to click
On lun, 2008-02-18 at 06:49 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> You are asking us to evaluate the quality of a software based only
> on the descriptions you provide.
There was a link to the source code in the initial mail too.
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally s
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Ack, what about only reporting (thus in a non automated way) on those which
> are not affected by any repackaging/similar version part?
It's might be acceptable but I'm not sure either. Some packages have
development version packaged and those develop
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.18.0843 +0100]:
> I really want to look at it, even though I am bad at Perl. Please
> try to release it. I am tempted to ask you to show it to me
> beforehand under a non-disclosure agreement, but then I might have
> difficulty keeping netcon
also sprach namnd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.18.0750 +0100]:
> - I have posted a full example of internal state on the first email.
> Runtime state contains info about interfaces, about networks running on
> those interfaces, routes running on those networks, and multipath routes
> using th
64 matches
Mail list logo
