Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Sunday 17 February 2008 17:22, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> >> If Debian's 0.11+1-1 is upstream's 0.11 why not just strip the '+1' using >> dversionmangle? >> That's in my POV the bug. >> > I think rewriting watch files for one time events is a mistake. If this > were > a permanent feature of the version numbering I would agree.
The thing is, when you make such kind of uploads all you have to make sure is that uscan still says your package is up to date. > I suppose the > easiest solution for me to not be bothered about this would be to remove > the watch file on the next upload. You won't be bothered if you also maintain the watch file. And as I said in my response to Raphael Hertzog I could skip those where the Debian version has something like +svn, +cvs, -pre, and also probably skip those such as yours: +n. But those I really don't want to exclude are the ones having 'dsfg', 'ds', 'debian', or ones whose watch file really reports an older version (e.g. in Debian: 2.3.1, upstream: 2.0.1). > > Scott K Cheers, Raphael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
