Scott Kitterman wrote:

> On Sunday 17 February 2008 15:41, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>
>> Please note that this situation often occurs when the maintainer didn't
>> make the watch file strip some +VCSrevNNNNN that was added to the Debian
>> Version.
>>
>> If nobody objects I'll start filling (in an automated way since there are
>> no false positives) reports on the 307 source packages which report a
>> Debian upstream version higher than Upstream version by the watch file.
> 
> I disagree.  You list my package:
> 
> Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> pysubnettree
> 
> The reason this package is in the state it's in is that upstream uploaded
> a new version of the package without changing the released version number
> so a
> fake version number was needed.  While suboptimal, there is no bug in the
> watch file.

If Debian's 0.11+1-1 is upstream's 0.11 why not just strip the '+1' using
dversionmangle?
That's in my POV the bug.

> 
> While this is no doubt a rare condition, I believe that your assertion
> that there are no false positives is incorrect.
> 
> Scott K

Cheers,
Raphael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to