retitle 432108 ITP: tijmp -- memory profiler for java 6
thanks
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 05:58:57PM +0200, Ji?í Pale?ek wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: tijmp
> Version : 0.3-pre1
> Upstream Author : Robert Olofsson
> * URL or Web page : http://www.kh
[Neil McGovern]
> Blootbot requires a mysql database to be up and running, or it will
> fail. However, this database doesn't need to be on the local
> host. How's best to handle this situation in the init script
> dependencies?
I suggest adding the mysql init.d script in the should-start header,
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> I do understand that an orphaned package of this kind (unmaintained
> upstream) puts a lot of burden on Debian QA. However, "xmms" appears
> to have a large user base and perhaps one of them will come forward
> to maintain the package if it is orphaned. If not, the pac
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
Hi
>> The maintainers of the xmms package in Debian are proposing the removal
>> of the aforementioned package. Please read on.
>
> The rationale given does not seem to clarify why the proposal is
> for removal instead of the maintainers just orphaning the pa
Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The maintainers of the xmms package in Debian are proposing the removal
>>of the aforementioned package. Please read on.
>
> The rationale given does not seem to clarify why the proposal is
> for removal instead of the maintainers just orphaning
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Removing the package from Debian will not affect current users that
much,
While I perfectly agree that there are replacements for xmms that at
first view look like a new version (for instnce audacious) many user
might have links form their desktops o
* "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" [Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:57:26 +0200]:
> Do you mean having the right audacious-plugins dependency on audacious
> wouldn't be enough ?
No, it would be enough. Just to be clear, I'm talking here about the
dependency scheme proposed in my first message to this bug report, for
Andreas Tille wrote:
> IMHO the only way to fix this is to provide a transitional
> package that for instance depends from audacious (or other clones),
> provides xmms and conflict with older xmms versions and install a
> symlink to the replacement.
this can and should only be done if there would
Hi,
I've noticed that the virtual package name `inetd-superserver' is
defined in the list of virtual package names, but it isn't used.
Instead, `inet-superserver' is used by openbsd-inetd, rlinetd, and
so on.
Why? Should `inetd-superserver' be replaced with `inet-superserver'?
Thanks,
--
Tatsuy
On Jul 08, Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that the virtual package name `inetd-superserver' is
> defined in the list of virtual package names, but it isn't used.
> Instead, `inet-superserver' is used by openbsd-inetd, rlinetd, and
> so on.
Looks like a typo.
> Why? S
Hi camm,
i tried to send you an mail.
so if you read this, check if relay.enhanced.com is accepting mail.
actually i get "connection timed out"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:48:39 +0100
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * There are a number of other GTK 1.2 packages.
>
> GTK+ 1.2 (and GLib 1.2) were abandoned upstream over *six years* ago.
> It's rather probable (nay, doubtless) th
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jul 08, Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've noticed that the virtual package name `inetd-superserver' is
>> defined in the list of virtual package names, but it isn't used.
>> Instead, `inet-superserver' is used by openbsd-inetd, rline
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:48:39 +0100
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Such a minimal port is hardly worth doing. It is possible to migrate
> from glib1 to glib2 in such a way (see #359299) but it is much har
* Neil Williams [Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:01:54 +0100]:
> $ apt-cache rdepends libgtk1.2 | grep -c -v "^lib"
> 316
> I'm not sure Debian needs to throw out over 300 applications before
> Lenny. True, most of those are dead upstream - AFAICT GnuCash was the
> last active upstream to make it to gtk2 - b
>
> $ apt-cache rdepends libgtk1.2 | grep -c -v "^lib"
> 316
>
> Is a dead upstream sufficient cause to drop a package from Debian in
> the absence of any RC bugs? Is a dependency on libgtk1.2 going to *be*
> an RC bug for Lenny? It seems a very big step, IMHO.
>
the list includes programs l
Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Removing the package from Debian will not affect current users that
>> much,
> While I perfectly agree that there are replacements for xmms that at
> first view look like a new version (for instnce audacious) many user
> might have links form their desktops or other hooks t
On 08-Jul-07, 07:07 (CDT), Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> might have links form their desktops or other hooks that just call
> /usr/bin/xmms. So this might affect a lot of users and especially
> those users that have no idea how to cope with a missing xmms in their
> PATH.
Removing a
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Steve Greenland wrote:
* can create desktop links and scripts
Yes.
* will notice the xmms has been removed
Perhaps not because of some dependencies (perhaps because GTK 1.x
will be removed) it might be removed by aptitude / synaptics besides
a lot of other stuff.
* wi
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 11:50:25PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Well, my reasoning was, that we just try to wild guess about
> user capabilities. I have just learned that user behave very
> unexpected and exactly these users happen to be quite vocal
> how broken Debian is. I just would like to g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fbreader
Version : 0.8.5
Upstream Author : Nikolay Pultsin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.fbreader.org
* License : GPL plus a few BSD files
Programming Lang: C++
De
> > Well, my reasoning was, that we just try to wild guess about
> > user capabilities. I have just learned that user behave very
> > unexpected and exactly these users happen to be quite vocal
> > how broken Debian is. I just would like to give them lesser
> > chances to be correct when they cla
Hi Brian,
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 12:42:26PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Now that Heimdal 0.8 has finally entered experimental, could I ask
> somebody to please check the patch to add versioned symbols in the
> shared libraries?
> The patch from previous versions wouldn't apply cleanly, so I had t
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 09:39:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 12:42:26PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > Now that Heimdal 0.8 has finally entered experimental, could I ask
> > somebody to please check the patch to add versioned symbols in the
> > shared libraries?
> > The
24 matches
Mail list logo
