On Jul 08, Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've noticed that the virtual package name `inetd-superserver' is > defined in the list of virtual package names, but it isn't used. > Instead, `inet-superserver' is used by openbsd-inetd, rlinetd, and > so on. Looks like a typo.
> Why? Should `inetd-superserver' be replaced with `inet-superserver'? Yes. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
