Hi,
I'm a member of the pkg-ruby-extras team. In this team, we use the
following scheme for the Maintainer and Uploaders fields:
Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" (ie best contact
point)
Uploaders: the team mailing list, + all the members of the team
(auto-generated usi
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:03:03AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a member of the pkg-ruby-extras team. In this team, we use the
> following scheme for the Maintainer and Uploaders fields:
> Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" (ie best contact
> point)
> Uploade
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:03:03 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[pkg-ruby]
> Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" (ie best contact
> point)
> Uploaders: the team mailing list, + all the members of the team
> (auto-generated using a cdbs rule)
It's interesting that you bring thi
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> in the KDE Team we use: Maintainer , Uploaders responsible for the packages>. The list beeing [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Java team uses the same method, but it has IMHO the huge drawback
that "uploaders" sometimes stop paying attention to a package wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Am Mo den 8. Jan 2007 um 5:15 schrieb Steve Langasek:
[flame]
is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
answer completely objective. To bring him down with this kind of answer
is absolute below the level cultivated
[Claus Fischer]
> 9. cdrecord's miserable state is well known
>
>Like the majority of other Linux users, I wonder when
> $ burn_my_iso_to_cd /dev/cdrom
>will work as expected.
Hmmm.
$ wodim filename.iso
works for most situations. But:
1) You must be root, or a member of the '
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:41:59AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Your mail to 'Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers' with the subject
>
> Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
>
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>
> The reason it is being h
* Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-08 10:09]:
> is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
> answer completely objective.
He didn't answer the question in case you haven't noted.
yours Martin
--
http://martin.wuertele.net/ -- Debian -- OFTC -- SPI -- [EMAIL PRO
Le lundi 08 janvier 2007 à 06:47 +, Debian Installer a écrit :
> Rejected: gtk+2.0_2.10.6-5_arm.changes: not signed by authorised uploader
Do I understand that the Great and Almighty Arm Buildd Maintainer that
no one shall override with "rogue" autobuilders is also willing to take
care of expe
also sprach Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.08.0007 +0100]:
> Is there any technical reason why busybox could not have such
> functionality? If not I'll file a bug report (and I'll write the
> code if I ever have spare time).
Why busybox and not just mdassemble, which is a stripped ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:15:13AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-08 10:09]:
>
> > is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
> > answer completely objective.
>
> He didn't answer
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:03:03AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm a member of the pkg-ruby-extras team. In this team, we use the
> following scheme for the Maintainer and Uploaders fields:
> Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" (ie best contact
> point)
> Uploaders: the t
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:24:50AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:03:03AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > - it's difficult to keep track of who is caring for that package (hint:
> > QA, MIA, ...)
>
> Uh? Why? Your maintainer field seems to address this issue. In
#include
* Peter Samuelson [Mon, Jan 08 2007, 03:26:21AM]:
>
> [Claus Fischer]
> > 9. cdrecord's miserable state is well known
> >
> >Like the majority of other Linux users, I wonder when
> > $ burn_my_iso_to_cd /dev/cdrom
> >will work as expected.
>
> Hmmm.
>
> $ wodim filenam
On Jan 08, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also note that it seems like there is currently nothing to create that
> symlink. It seems like kernel passes only names like /dev/cdrwX where X
> is steadily increasing. Only /dev/cdrom seems to be useable as a
> constant filename but for many
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:07:12AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> It's not always possible on other architectures. What do you do on a
> platform
> that supports the BSD disk label and has no type number?
>
> Are there any platforms other than i386, AMD64, and IA64 that support the
> partiti
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:40:17 -0700, "Wesley J. Landaker"
>>
>>Months; I've had to switch 10's of clients to use ftp.debian.org instead
>>since I've been getting intermittant problems like this with
>>ftp.us.debian.org since ~ October last year.
>
> That's
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2007-01-08 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The perl team, on the other hand, uses the different scheme:
> > Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package"
> > Uploaders: the team mailing list, + members who actually care for the
> > package (who have touched it in the past,
#include
* Marco d'Itri [Mon, Jan 08 2007, 02:21:12PM]:
> On Jan 08, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Also note that it seems like there is currently nothing to create that
> > symlink. It seems like kernel passes only names like /dev/cdrwX where X
> > is steadily increasing. Only /d
Christoph Berg wrote:
> Note that you can subscribe additional packages to any maintainer
> view. The GIS team does that:
Is there a way to subscribe a mailing list to receive bug reports also,
without having the mailing list in the Maintainer field?
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Russell Coker dijo [Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:07:12AM +1100]:
> > Other than the partition type, there's no way to do this, and
> > setting the partition type is not always desirable.
>
> It's not always possible on other architectures. What do you do on a
> platform
> that supports the BSD disk
Pierre Habouzit dijo [Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:58:49AM +0100]:
> > Uh? Why? Your maintainer field seems to address this issue. In our
> > scheme that's would be more a problem, but if the mailing list is
> > responsive it's enough. Think for example at the debian-release mailing
> > list: it's a lis
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: deepak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: libperlmenu-perl -- short description This package is now orphaned
by
Deepak Tripathi
Message-ID: <[EMAIL
Hello,
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Mo den 8. Jan 2007 um 5:15 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> [flame]
>
> is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
> answer completely objective. To bring him down with this kind of answer
> is absolute below the
> Christoph Berg wrote:
>> Note that you can subscribe additional packages to any maintainer
>> view. The GIS team does that:
>
> Is there a way to subscribe a mailing list to receive bug reports also,
> without having the mailing list in the Maintainer field?
>
> Marcus
On the PTS you can subscri
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007, Marcus Better wrote:
> Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Note that you can subscribe additional packages to any maintainer
> > view. The GIS team does that:
>
> Is there a way to subscribe a mailing list to receive bug reports also,
> without having the mailing list in the Maintainer
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:42:11AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit dijo [Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:58:49AM +0100]:
> > > Uh? Why? Your maintainer field seems to address this issue. In our
> > > scheme that's would be more a problem, but if the mailing list is
> > > responsive it's enough.
On Jan 08, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My impression is that it always takes the X string part from cdromX and
> appends it to cdrw, resulting in no "cdrw" symlink if "cdrom" has no
> writting capabilities. If I am right then... uhm, it sucks and should be
> changed ASAP. A setup lik
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pdk
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Darrin Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://componentizedlinux.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Componentized Linux P
#include
* Marco d'Itri [Mon, Jan 08 2007, 05:34:47PM]:
> On Jan 08, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My impression is that it always takes the X string part from cdromX and
> > appends it to cdrw, resulting in no "cdrw" symlink if "cdrom" has no
> > writting capabilities. If I am ri
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 03:26:21AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
:
: [Claus Fischer]
: > 9. cdrecord's miserable state is well known
: >
: >Like the majority of other Linux users, I wonder when
: > $ burn_my_iso_to_cd /dev/cdrom
: >will work as expected.
:
: Hmmm.
:
: $ wodim fi
> in the KDE Team we use: Maintainer , Uploaders responsible for the packages>. The list beeing [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ditto for D-I packages...
That policy could also progressively be adopted by the fonts packaging
team but I don't consider that team solid enough to really
Russel Coker spoke:
: >The rescue mode of the installer needs a step
: >to activate MD devices. Currently, only the plain
: >disk partitions are visible; that's no help.
:
: Sounds like a reasonable request. Filed a bug report?
:
: Note that it has to be an optional measure.
I wil
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
* Package name: pdk
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Darrin Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://componentizedlinux.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Componentized Linux Platform Development Kit (PDK)
Gre
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for
> amd64, there's a lot of it not built for x86 yet.
>
> I heard several times people claim experimental was autobuilt, but are
> there any x86 autobuilder set up for experimental ?
Ther
Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
>
> cp -avx --preserve=all 1/* 2 # rsync will do as well
Of course, 1/* misses any dot-files in 1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It looks like Woody has moved to the archives:
http://archive.debian.org/dists/woody/
... I didn't see an announcment about it to any of the usual lists,
but perhaps I missed it. FYI, there probably still are companies
(like mine :) running large numbers of Woody boxes for legacy
applications wh
Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:48:13PM -0800, Will Lowe wrote:
> It looks like Woody has moved to the archives:
>
> http://archive.debian.org/dists/woody/
>
> ... I didn't s
Package: libperlmenu-perl
Priority: extra
Section: perl
Installed-Size: 220
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Version: 4.0-4
Replaces: perlmenu
Depends: perl (>= 5.6.0-16), libcurses-perl
Conflicts: perlmenu
Filename: pool/main/libp/libperlmenu-perl/libperlmenu-perl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libescape-ruby
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Tanaka Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.a-k-r.org/escape/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
Am Montag, den 08.01.2007, 21:50 -0800 schrieb Will Lowe:
> Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
> there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
http://www.debian.org/distrib/archive.html
mentions several rsync sites.
Regards
Thomas
--
To UN
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wfo
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Tanaka Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.a-k-r.org/wfo/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : wfo
wfo
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:50:31PM -0800, Will Lowe wrote:
> Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
> there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
ftp.nl.debian.org::debian-archive
(archive.d.o does support rsync, but its host restricted, aiui)
Cheers,
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 00:36, "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Are there any platforms other than i386, AMD64, and IA64 that support the
> > partition type number?
>
> Not sure. Is there not some magic number associated with different
> partition types? I don't mean like y
On Monday 08 January 2007 20:57, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.08.0007 +0100]:
> > Is there any technical reason why busybox could not have such
> > functionality? If not I'll file a bug report (and I'll write the
> > code if I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: treil
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Daiki Ueno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.unixuser.org/~ueno/software/treil/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
Descri
Hi,
* RalfGesellensetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-03 23:47]:
> Did the domain expire?
>
> demudi.org is full of dead links now.
http://www.agnula.info/ seems to be the new domain.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de
JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
Forget about tha
47 matches
Mail list logo
