On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:03:03 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [pkg-ruby] > Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" (ie best contact > point) > Uploaders: the team mailing list, + all the members of the team > (auto-generated using a cdbs rule)
It's interesting that you bring this up because in the pkg-perl team there were discussions about "doing it the pk-ruby way" (but up to now almost everybody disliked the idea). > The perl team, on the other hand, uses the different scheme: > Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" > Uploaders: the team mailing list, + members who actually care for the > package (who have touched it in the past, for example). In fact usually it's Maintainer: <the list>, Uploaders: <list of people who have touched the package>. Cf. http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/policy.html#debian_control_handling > See also, on the same topic, > http://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2007/01/msg00007.html Ah you've found the thread already :-) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- You're dead, Jim. -- McCoy, "Amok Time", stardate 3372.7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
