On Jan 08, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My impression is that it always takes the X string part from cdromX and > appends it to cdrw, resulting in no "cdrw" symlink if "cdrom" has no > writting capabilities. If I am right then... uhm, it sucks and should be > changed ASAP. A setup like mine (first drive a pure reader and the > second is the writter) is not that uncommon. Yes, it works this way (see /lib/udev/write_cd_rules). I think this is the least confusing scheme *and* other distributions work this way too so I am not sure it's a good idea to change it. But feel free to try to persuade me...
BTW, now I see that it's a removable device. See #395962 about how to get really persistent names. I'd like to fix this for etch, but I am really busy with my day job right now and I have not even been able to follow up this bug. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
