Uhhh,
I did not want to launch such a big discussion :-)
Here is my opinion (this is my first packages for Debian, and people on
debian-mentors know it has not been easy to follow the whole policy ;-)
- I first used a simple "rules" script, because I can not imagine using
a wrapper while not know
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wired
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : The Wired Team
* URL : http://wired.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : music production and creatio
The most interesting fact is, that I obtain about 10MB/s with
my Debian client if I connect the file server to a 100MBit Port
on the switch.
You might also want to try another GB switch to see if that has the same
problem. NFS seems to do quite funny things (perhaps some speed hacks
including
Loïc Minier skrev:
Is Debhelper our C and CDBS our C++?
CDBS is to debhelper as XSLT (or prolog) is to C (or another procedural
language).
- tfheen
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:15:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Daniel Kobras writes ("Re: Renaming a package"):
> > but the alternative patch to dpkg is quite simple (see
> > below). Alas, it changes current behaviour.
>
> I don't think it this patch is correct as is, but something similar
> migh
Hi, i have this problem:I have debian 3.1 sarge installed on my PC, but i encounter some problems with my sound device. My sound card is C-media(external) it works ok, but i have a 5.1 EBODA sound system and i don`t know how to make it work with debian. I tried with alsa but i can only use a 4 chan
This is a *DEVELOPMENT* mailing list. Send this to debian-user (I've
forwarded this) or ask on the Debian forums
(http://forums.debian.net).
On 6/12/06, KlarsDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, i have this problem:
I have debian 3.1 sarge installed on my PC, but i encounter some problems
with my
|
| tags 356948 + help
| retitle 356948 stumpwm: clarify how to start this WM in the README.Debian
| thanks
|
| Hello!
|
| For d-d: I'd like a more general advice about the user request, which
| I'm quite reluctant to accomplish.
|
| For all: please honor the R-T and M-F-T headers (no need to c
Re: Steve Langasek 2006-06-10 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is it no longer a requirement of NM that applicants demonstrate themselves
> capable of putting together a source package without the use of rules
> helpers?
Not in that length. The template question used by most AMs is:
Write a small shell sc
| Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| reassign 363486 debian-policy
|
| each package should agree on which interface is needed to be able to
| provide a specific alternative. And if they should provide a virtual
| package for it.
|
| On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 14:44:08 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
| > Pa
Hello since i didnt get any response on d-sparc i post it here too.
Daniel
Hello,
i have here an full equiped E420R wich frequently crashes under sarge etc..
with some
SYM... errors. Now i am looking for a person who is really experienced
with such machines and the Hardware inside to have a look
Attn:
I know you would be surprised to read from someone relatively unknown to you
before. My name is Sgt. Mark Hanson, a U.S. Army 1st Armored Division, which
was deployed to Iraq in the beginning of the war in Iraq. I would like to share
some highly personal classified information about my
also sprach Jean Parpaillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.12.0931 +0200]:
> Uhhh,
> I did not want to launch such a big discussion :-)
Then you should not have written to debian-devel. :)
> - I first used a simple "rules" script, because I can not imagine
> using a wrapper while not knowing the sy
On 6/7/06, Jon Kåre Hellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Second question: Has a binding legal agreement been made? Indeed it has.
Ftp-masters are empowered by Debian to include packages in the archive.
They are without question agents of Debian. Debian must accept the legal
consequences of their age
On 6/12/06, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any coordinated effort to standardize the name of the provided
programs in /etc/alternatives?
I don't think this concerns debian-policy at all. The use of
alternatives is something that needs to be coordinated amont the
maintainers of
an off-topic question:
why x-office-word, x-office-excel, etc?
are these trying to express "the replacement for microsoft windows
word, excel" ?
or is this what text documents or spreadsheet documents being called?
-- Fred
On 6/12/06, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/12/06,
* Joey Hess [Sun, 11 Jun 2006 19:53:41 -0400]:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > package (1.1) unstable; urgency=low
> > [ Joe Random ]
> > * Foo.
> > -- UNRELEASED
> This is very annoying when doing a test build, since it's not a valid
> changelog format and so you have to fake up some r
-common packages are used to reduce the size of the archive; arch
independant data need not be included in each of the 10+ arch-specific
binary packages; only one package is needed.
As expected, most of the contents of the -common packages are in
/usr/share:
time zgrep -Ff <(apt-cache search -n
KlarsDev wrote:
Hi, i have this problem:
I have debian 3.1 sarge installed on my PC, but i encounter some
problems with my sound device. My sound card is C-media(external) it
works ok, but i have a 5.1 EBODA sound system and i don`t know how to
make it work with debian.
I tried with alsa but
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeremy Hankins writes ("Non-DD's in debian-legal"):
>> I'm not sure I understand this part, though. Do you think that folks
>> like myself, who are not DD's, should not participate in the discussions
>> on d-l?
>
> Actually, I think they should not partic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kolabadmin
Version : not yet released, talking to author
Upstream Author : Tobias König <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://wgess16.dyndns.org/~tobias/qt/kolabadmin/
* License
* Adeodato Simó [Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:11:56 +0200]:
> > It would be fairly easy to make dch only update the date when doing a
> > dch -r.
> Mmm? To be consistent with my quoted paragraph, this should read
[snip: what joeyh said, with different words]
Eh, excuse my mental hiccup, you got it right,
On 12/06/06, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| tags 356948 + help
| retitle 356948 stumpwm: clarify how to start this WM in the README.Debian
AFTER
Description: a Common Lisp window manager
Note: this is not and end user program; i.e. a regular window manager.
Why not just
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 07:39:55PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> What you want is:
>>
>> jed: Provides: jed-abi-23
>> jed-extra: Depends: jed-abi-23
>>
>> You should add such a provides in jed now and update the jed-extra
>> package asap. The
Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:15:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Daniel Kobras writes ("Re: Renaming a package"):
>> > but the alternative patch to dpkg is quite simple (see
>> > below). Alas, it changes current behaviour.
>>
>> I don't think it this pa
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -common packages are used to reduce the size of the archive; arch
> independant data need not be included in each of the 10+ arch-specific
> binary packages; only one package is needed.
>
> As expected, most of the contents of the -common packages are in
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-07 02:20]:
>> We did pick two compiler warnings and scanned the build logs of one
>> archive rebuild on alpha (64bit), where wrong code may be generated.
>> These warnings can be found in 1600 packages [4];
* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-09 16:21]:
> Moreover, I don't understand how you managed to build xulrunner with gcc
> 4.1. I just tried and got loads of
> error: no suitable 'operator delete' for 'whateverClass'
> on delete operators defined as operator delete(void *, size_t).
>From w
* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-08 07:46]:
> > Mike Hommey
> > xulrunner 1.8.0.1-11
>
> What I quite don't get is why xulrunner gets warnings while firefox
> and thunderbird don't...
I compiled with both gcc 4.1 and 4.2. GCC 4.2 cannot compile
thunderbird because of a compiler bug, a
| On 12/06/06, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > |
| > | tags 356948 + help
| > | retitle 356948 stumpwm: clarify how to start this WM in the README.Debi=
| an
| >AFTER
| >
| > Description: a Common Lisp window manager
| > Note: this is not and end user program; i.e. a regular
"Ian Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy Hankins writes ("Non-DD's in debian-legal"):
I'm not sure I understand this part, though. Do you think that folks
like myself, who are not DD's, should not participate in the discussions
on d-l?
Actually, I thi
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:35:32AM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
> This is one of the most common accusations leveled against d-l: that the
> membership of d-l is skewed and not representative of Debian as a whole.
> If that's true there's not much d-l can do about it, of course, and the
> whole pro
| an off-topic question:
|
| why x-office-word, x-office-excel, etc?
| are these trying to express "the replacement for microsoft windows
| word, excel" ?
| or is this what text documents or spreadsheet documents being called?
It's almost industry standard to refer to "Word" as the word processor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: collectd
Version : 3.9.3
Upstream Author : Florian Forster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://collectd.org/
* License : GPL
Description : statistics collection daem
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, I *do* believe that d-l is a cesspit, and I for one am very
> glad that in its current incarnation, it is not at all binding and has
> no value other than being a debating socity --- a debating socity that
> I am very glad that I can avoid, thank
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wikipediafs
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Mathieu Blondel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://wikipediafs.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : View
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:53:57PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> | >
> | > The same problem is with Office programs:
> | >
> | > lyx
> | > abiword
> | > oowriter
> | > ...
> | >
> | > The /etc/alternatives contains a good framework to canonicalize actions to
> | > common names available in
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Vacation Message
I'll be on a bicycle tour until May 9, 2004.
Any real messages, please contact my wife by phone.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
What is a clean way to introduce a delay between the
scripts in /etc/init.d ?
I saw a problem that /etc/rc2.d/S27bind9 started before
/etc/rc2.d/S25ifplugd actually completed all the tasks
...
Specifically, ifplugd, with the help of resolvconf,
would generate the file /var/run/bind/named.opt
LEE, Yui-wah (Clement) wrote:
> What is a clean way to introduce a delay between the
> scripts in /etc/init.d ?
>
> I saw a problem that /etc/rc2.d/S27bind9 started before
> /etc/rc2.d/S25ifplugd actually completed all the tasks
> ...
>
> Specifically, ifplugd, with the help of resolvconf,
> woul
"LEE, Yui-wah (Clement)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> What is a clean way to introduce a delay between the
> scripts in /etc/init.d ?
>
> I saw a problem that /etc/rc2.d/S27bind9 started before
> /etc/rc2.d/S25ifplugd actually completed all the tasks
> ...
>
> Specifically, ifplugd, with
* Yui-wah LEE:
> What is a clean way to introduce a delay between the
> scripts in /etc/init.d ?
Attempts at synchronization based on time are doomed to fail.
> I could force a delay between the two scripts by
> introducing another script (run at S26) that does
> nothing but sleep for a fixed ti
Am Montag, 12. Juni 2006 22:17 schrieb Joey Hess:
> LEE, Yui-wah (Clement) wrote:
> > What is a clean way to introduce a delay between the
> > scripts in /etc/init.d ?
> >
> > I saw a problem that /etc/rc2.d/S27bind9 started before
> > /etc/rc2.d/S25ifplugd actually completed all the tasks
> > ...
man, 29,.05.2006 kl. 22.00 +0200, skrev Frank Küster:
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sounds like a clean approach, but is there a clean transition?
> > I doubt you can upload a source package that generates the same
> > binary package as another source package.
> Oh, you can. Unt
On 6/12/06, Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The d-l list has a problem which is shared by many Debian mailing
lists (including debian-vote and debian-devel, and I'm sure it's not
limited to them) which is that far too many people subscribe to the
"last post wins" school of debate. People
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:52:45AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > However, I *do* believe that d-l is a cesspit, and I for one am very
> > glad that in its current incarnation, it is not at all binding and has
> > no value other than being a deba
One thing you can do is check every few seconds to see if the script has
completed.
You could, for example, have bind9 remove a blocking file when it is
starting, and recreate it when it is done (or vice versa). Have your
later script check for the existence of the file when it starts.
It's a
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Probably because a change in debhelper is done with a change of
> compatibility level. And you still can use the old behaviour by using
> the appropriate level.
I was talking about mistakes, and package care, and package reviewed by
several persons of a t
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Probably because a change in debhelper is done with a change of
> compatibility level. And you still can use the old behaviour by using
> the appropriate level.
I was talking about mistakes, and package care, and package reviewed by
several persons of a t
Hi,
> With the upcoming releases of the last packages which
> didn't support 2.4 yet (Plone on the Zope application server) we may
> be able to drop support for 2.3 in sid and etch as well.
For reference, decompyle still needs python2.3. There are two issues:
1. It won't build under python2.4.
Coin,
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For reference, decompyle still needs python2.3. There are two issues:
>
> 1. It won't build under python2.4. I have fixes for this that I haven't
>uploaded (and that need some more testing and tidying up).
You may still ask for help.
> 2. It
>Binary dependent
>extensions are put for all supported python versions into the
>same python-foo package.
So these packages are going to depend on all supported python versions,
making impossible to remove old python versions from user's systems?
pgp8TX0wkQDNo.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi,
> > 1. It won't build under python2.4. I have fixes for this that I haven't
> >uploaded (and that need some more testing and tidying up).
>
> You may still ask for help.
This will be easy enough to have ready by the time 2.3 is removed, which
I'm assuming is not happening tomorrow. Wh
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:39:29AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> >Binary dependent
> >extensions are put for all supported python versions into the
> >same python-foo package.
> So these packages are going to depend on all supported python versions,
> making impossible to remo
"LEE, Yui-wah (Clement)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is a clean way to introduce a delay between the
> scripts in /etc/init.d ?
Don't.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAIR, a package
> should not have to depend on python2.3 and python2.4; instead, applications
> that need a specific version of the interpreter should depend on it
> themselves.
I hope that it will be possible for such apps to do it without
specifying
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:59:58PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > AFAIR, a package
> > should not have to depend on python2.3 and python2.4; instead, applications
> > that need a specific version of the interpreter should depend on it
> > themsel
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:59:58PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > AFAIR, a package
> > should not have to depend on python2.3 and python2.4; instead, applications
> > that need a specific version of the interpreter should depend on it
> > themselv
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ccd2iso
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Danny Kurniawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/ccd2iso/
* License : GPL
Description : Converte
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:49:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> - The current pythonX.Y-foo packages having modules in the python
>library path are collapsed into one package python-foo. Binary
>independent modules are made available for the python versions
>curr
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 08:17:17AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:49:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > - The current pythonX.Y-foo packages having modules in the python
> >library path are collapsed into one package python-
61 matches
Mail list logo
