No need to Cc, I'm subscribed[0].
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 23:39 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> "Brian M. Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 22:59 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
[gnucash not appearing on buildd.d.o; is this normal?]
> > Yes. You want experiment
Hi, you all.
For those of you who enjoy to live in the bleeding edge, have loads of free
time or just feel like helping a bit, there is a dspam package in experimental
waiting for your love.
Please, give it a try and if you find a bug, report it.
Otherwise, should no showstoppers are found by th
[Jeroen Massar]
> Just bump the priority to S19 this will make it start before the
> default value of all other daemons, on a more-or-less standard colo
> box that means waiting for large tools like mailman, mysql, postfix,
> apache2, makedev etc.
Would running the scripts in parallel solve you p
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:59:17AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> xen 3.0 is out since the 6th of december!
> so it has seen considerable amount of production use since.
> as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel,
> it makes a lot of sense to release both in the same run.
Th
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Guido Trotter wrote:
>
> Absolutely true! The current xen team is fully agrees on this position!
>
> Guido
xen 3.0 is out since the 6th of december!
so it has seen considerable amount of production use since.
as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel,
it
Hello Cesare,
In machine1 hdparm is not currently installed, but it was 1 year ago when the
machine1 had woody installed. I suppose hdparm does not change anything to
the disk itself but only to the ide modules of the kernel?
In machine2, hdparm is installed, but I do not remember to have chang
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 19:18 +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Note that individual maintainers can already configure dput to stop the
> upload on lintian/linda errors.
Yes, but the point raised was whether it would be better to centralise
that. There are a lot of opportunities to run lintian but app
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:59:17AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel,
> it makes a lot of sense to release both in the same run.
I hear that the kernel team don't want to maintain userspace tools.
> the debian kernel team has always bee
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:59:17AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Guido Trotter wrote:
> > Absolutely true! The current xen team is fully agrees on this position!
> xen 3.0 is out since the 6th of december!
> so it has seen considerable amount of production use since.
> as
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi,
> The current package from pkg-xen is not releasable.
>
Then why don't you just join and commit your fixes before anybody tried to
release it?
Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
This one time, at band camp, Hamish Moffatt said:
> flashplugin-nonfree itself contains scripts which I presume meet the
> DFSG. Do you think we should put it in main?
I assume this is a troll, and you have not bothered to read any of the
other messages in this tediously long thread.
> > ndiswr
[Thijs Kinkhorst]
> Yes, but the point raised was whether it would be better to
> centralise that. There are a lot of opportunities to run lintian but
> appearently a lot of packages with errors/warnings are being
> uploaded.
Sometimes lintian tests have bugs / limitations - false positives which
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
>
> The reason this interests me is that this seems to be the key
> question; it seems to me that if something is *now* not useful for
> free-software-only systems, it might be better placed in contrib (and
> the installer fixed, and perhaps n
Hello Jacques,
I reply here below:
Le Tuesday 28 February 2006 00:56, jacques Normand a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:33:19PM +0100, Juan Piñeros wrote:
> > 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000d 100 100 050
> > Pre-fail Offline
> > - 51
> > 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x001a 1
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:31:17AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Hamish Moffatt said:
> > flashplugin-nonfree itself contains scripts which I presume meet the
> > DFSG. Do you think we should put it in main?
>
> I assume this is a troll, and you have not bothered to rea
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:59:46AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> [0] In case you're unsure, you can check the X-Spam-Status header, which
> will tell you that I am an LDOSUBSCRIBER, in which case you can assume
Just nitpicking: there is no X-Spam-Status: header in my copy; however,
there is a
[Hamish Moffatt]
> > flashplugin-nonfree itself contains scripts which I presume meet
> > the DFSG. Do you think we should put it in main?
[Stephen Gran]
> I assume this is a troll
Your refusal to answer his question is itself an answer.
> > > ndiswrapper is a piece of free software. It does
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:39:21PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> How do I get the package queued more generally? Is it automatic?
Yes. But the experimental buildds don't build from incoming, so you
have to wait at least one dinstall run for it to happen. And since you
uploaded gnucash short
This one time, at band camp, Hamish Moffatt said:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:31:17AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Hamish Moffatt said:
> > > flashplugin-nonfree itself contains scripts which I presume meet the
> > > DFSG. Do you think we should put it in main?
> >
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:20:30AM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> For those of you who enjoy to live in the bleeding edge, have loads of free
> time or just feel like helping a bit, there is a dspam package in experimental
> waiting for your love.
Finally :-) Thank you for packaging it!
> Please,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:50:16PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Or, perhaps it's not true that there are no free drivers for it. The
> claim was also made that there was a single free driver out there for
> use with ndiswrapper, but others claimed that the hardware in question
> is already
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:23:05PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:48:51PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> The question is not whether there is such a dependency declared; the
> >> question is whether the software
Hi,
I hereby appeal to the technical committee to reject to rule on this
request, on the grounds that this is not a technical matter, and
therefore falls outside the authority of the technical committee.
The question at hand is whether the statement "this package is not
useful without non-free so
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:25:57AM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The current package from pkg-xen is not releasable.
> Then why don't you just join and commit your fixes before anybody tried to
> release it?
I can.
Bastian
--
Fa
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:02:34PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:25:57AM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > The current package from pkg-xen is not releasable.
> > Then why don't you just join and commit yo
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 04:45:04PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> If there are no uses of it (actual *uses*, where it is *useful*) with
> free programs, then it sure seems like a wrapper for non-free
> programs.
You want a useful use case of the NDIS CIPE driver? Allright, I'll give
you one.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 10:04:59AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> Taking it out of main moves us in the wrong direction if our goal is to
> give our users a *usable* operating system, as opposed to some kind of
> 'proof of concept' OS that some people here seem to want to create, but
> that the majo
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:21:56PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> In any case, the real point here is the following statement from
> >> 2.2.2, which says that contrib is for "wrapper packages or other sorts
> >> of free accessories for non-free
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:17:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
> > I can.
>
> :)
>
> Guido, be warned that Bastian often communicates with a few monosylabes and
> SVN commits :) This doesn't make working with him too problematic usually
> though :)
>
We've been a bit more chatty, for now, b
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 10:59:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I recently uploaded gnucash 1.9.1 to Debian experimental, but this
> doesn't seem to have affected buildd.debian.org. Is this normal?
That question has already been adequately answered by other people in
this thread.
However,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:13:34PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> This, however, is a bug, and AAUI one that is in the process of being
> resolved.
[mumble, mumble]
No, not Apple Attachment Unit Interface, "AIUI": As I Understand It.
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to As
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:36:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The CIPE driver doesn't actually need hardware, since it is an
> encryption layer. As such, I can use it as a test-case for ndiswrapper,
> to find out how the latter works and to actually be able to test whether
> I set it up corre
Hi Wouter!
You wrote:
> The correct way to proceed would seem to be a ruling by a body
> authorized to make authoritative interpretations of the Social Contract,
> or, failing that (since I believe we have no such body), a General
> Resolution.
Wouldn't the ftp-masters be the right authority for
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:25:37PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:36:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > The CIPE driver doesn't actually need hardware, since it is an
> > encryption layer. As such, I can use it as a test-case for ndiswrapper,
> > to find out how the
Bas Zoetekouw writes:
> Hi Wouter!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > The correct way to proceed would seem to be a ruling by a body
> > authorized to make authoritative interpretations of the Social Contract,
> > or, failing that (since I believe we have no such body), a General
> > Resolution.
>
> Wouldn't
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:45:00AM -0500, Michael Poole wrote:
> Bas Zoetekouw writes:
>
> > Hi Wouter!
> >
> > You wrote:
> >
> > > The correct way to proceed would seem to be a ruling by a body
> > > authorized to make authoritative interpretations of the Social Contract,
> > > or, failing tha
Le Mardi 28 Février 2006 10:20, Jesus Climent a écrit :
> Hi, you all.
>
> For those of you who enjoy to live in the bleeding edge, have loads of free
> time or just feel like helping a bit, there is a dspam package in
> experimental waiting for your love.
>
> Please, give it a try and if you find
Hi Michael!
[Cc'ed Manoj, as he's the authority on the constitution...]
You wrote:
> > Wouldn't the ftp-masters be the right authority for this issue? It is
> > them who decide if the package can go into main or not.
>
> The package is already in main. The person who filed this bug thinks
> t
Hi,
i'm interested in whether it is possible to modify the Linux kernel so that
user applications can use the whole 4GB of virtual address space while the
kernel runs it's own AS.
If yes, how complicated would that be ??
Thanks,
Thomas
--
DSL-Aktion wegen großer Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 ve
On 2/20/06, Andrew Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 14:19 +0100, Josh Hurst wrote:
>
>
> Does the Debian ksh93 package include libast and libshell?
>
>
> No -
>
> dpkg -L ksh
> /.
> /bin
> /bin/ksh93
> /usr
> /usr/bin
> /usr/bin/shcomp
> /usr/share
> /usr/share/
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:19:45PM +0100, Mad Props wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm interested in whether it is possible to modify the Linux kernel so that
> user applications can use the whole 4GB of virtual address space while the
> kernel runs it's own AS.
>
> If yes, how complicated would that be ??
Ru
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:29:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
> I guess that if people are able to find a kernel source tree outside of
> debian, they are perfectly capable of downloading and applying a patch too.
>
> Just include an URL to wherever such a patch is in the README.Debian of the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: omgifol
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Fredrik Johansson
* URL : http://www.dd.chalmers.se/~frejohl/doom.html
* License : MIT-style
Description : python library for ma
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:19:45PM +0100, Mad Props wrote:
> i'm interested in whether it is possible to modify the Linux kernel so that
> user applications can use the whole 4GB of virtual address space while the
> kernel runs it's own AS.
Why would you want to do such a thing? If you really need
Hallo! Du (Amaya) hast geschrieben:
>Cord Beermann wrote:
>> Also we (the listmasters) don't train the bayes-filter,
>
>May I ask why?
You may. ;-)
I looked into this and found that we automagically train the bayes
with the spam we get, but we don't train in the ham.
Another thing for the ever
Hi,
I am trying to use a USB-to-UART (8 port) converter. I expected it to
get recognized and create device names like /dev/ttyUSB0, /dev/ttyUSB1
./dev/ttyUSB7. However, this did not happen.
[Surprisingly, the single USB-to-UART (1 port) converter works fine and
/dev/ttyUSB0 is available for m
As far as I know, it should exist in Debian too.
For instance, if you look at http://www.phor.net/phpsysinfo-dev/, you'll
find an updated log of the system information of an host with
Debian/testing. And it has this dir.
Same if you look at http://s1cness.is-a-geek.com/phpsysinfo/
It is mentio
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:38:53PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> One point that nobody raised so far: _reliable_ working on ndiswrapper
> depends on the 16k-stack patch that is not available in Debian AFAIK.
> Without that patch, drivers requiring ndiswrapper (being free or not)
> only work by pure
On 02/28/06 04:19:45PM +0100, Mad Props wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm interested in whether it is possible to modify the Linux kernel so that
> user applications can use the whole 4GB of virtual address space while the
> kernel runs it's own AS.
>
> If yes, how complicated would that be ??
>
> Thanks,
>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 06:20:47PM +0100, Sergio Callegari wrote:
> As far as I know, it should exist in Debian too.
No, it doesn't.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I'm a long-time debian user that aspires to be a DD someday. I
recently posted many RFS's on debian-mentors, some of which were
software that I'm both the upstream author and packager of. These
packages are native Debian packages, i.e. their source distribution is
only one .tar.gz. It was
ti, 2006-02-28 kello 19:39 +0200, Panu Kalliokoski kirjoitti:
> I would like to ask whether there really is such a guideline, and if so,
> which are the technical / political reasons that lead to it.
There is a somewhat common feeling among Debian developers that Debian
packaging should be separat
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:36:46AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:38:53PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > One point that nobody raised so far: _reliable_ working on ndiswrapper
> > depends on the 16k-stack patch that is not available in Debian AFAIK.
> > Without that patch,
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
>>
>> The reason this interests me is that this seems to be the key
>> question; it seems to me that if something is *now* not useful for
>> free-software-only systems, it might be better placed in c
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:50:16PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Or, perhaps it's not true that there are no free drivers for it. The
>> claim was also made that there was a single free driver out there for
>> use with ndiswrapper, but others c
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's been answered a zillion times already, you just didn't accept the
> answer as valid. That's okay, but re-asking it again and again isn't
> going to give you a different answer.
My question was not answered. Is ndiswrapper useful on a
free-softwa
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are a few ways to interpret the word "wrapper". Ndiswrapper could
> certainly be seen as a "wrapper" of sorts, but not in the way that
> policy means. A "wrapper", as used in policy, is a script or small
> executable that will set up the environm
Josh Hurst wrote:
> On 2/20/06, Andrew Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 14:19 +0100, Josh Hurst wrote:
>>> Does the Debian ksh93 package include libast and libshell?
>>
>> No -
[snip]
> Seems these libraries are statically linked. It may be worth to think
> about prov
Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
> Look, if the position is that ndiswrapper is, at present, only useful
> with non-free software, but it should, even so, be in Debian main, I'm
> prepared to entertain that possibility. But I can't even figure out
> what you *are* saying, because everytime I ask, peop
Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at the first packages alphabetically in (main/)admin, one
> could ask the same question of a great many packages. The aboot*
> packages assume you have DEC/HP's SRM firmware on your machine.
> acorn-fdisk assumes that you have the Acorn RISC OS.
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 14:34 schrieb conn itnel:
> I am a student and according to my academic project requirement.. I need
> to cross compile the kernel on P4 (PC HOST) for i386 (TARGET). Now the PC
> Host and Target contains the same debian 3.1r1 sarge. I successfully
> crosscompil
"Josh Hurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems these libraries are statically linked. It may be worth to think
> about providing shared library versions since there are many
> applications which can use libshell and libast. For example AT&T
> claims a 30%+ performance improvement for perl applic
On Monday 27 February 2006 23:51, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I have uploaded gnucash 1.9.1 to the experimental archive today. This
> is the long-awaited GNOME-2 version of gnucash.
>
> Users of gnucash who are willing to use this experimental software are
> desired. It is not a good idea for ev
Scripsit Tom Rauchenwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am not a DD, so maybe my opinion is idiotic. But: the thing is free,
> it allows people to use non-free drivers, but it is entirerly up to the
> user to use those drivers. I don't know, but for me this discussion is
> pointless. Does ndiswrapper req
Scripsit Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It was pointed to me that packages should be preferably non-native,
> even if no source release without the debian/ subdir has ever
> existed.
> I would like to ask whether there really is such a guideline, and if so,
> which are the technical / poli
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The correct way to proceed would seem to be a ruling by a body
> authorized to make authoritative interpretations of the Social Contract,
> or, failing that (since I believe we have no such body), a General
> Resolution.
You (or wh
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 21:26 schrieb Henning Makholm:
> Further, providing an .orig.tar.gz without the debian/ directory helps
> prevent confusion for users on non-Debian systems.
So the same reason for not including a .spec file (for creating RPM packages).
On the other side, some user may
Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006-02-28 01:00:08 +0100 :
> Users of gnucash who are willing to use this experimental software
> are desired. It is not a good idea for every casual user to use it
> (or I would have put it in unstable), but testing will help the
> process along.
Okay. Built it in a pbuil
David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did you include the SQL bits of gnucach?
The package I have uploaded does not support SQL. My intention is to
turn that on (I am uncertain yet whether it is worth making it a
separate package as it used to be) once 1.9.x has had a time to
settle.
I
Juan Piñeros wrote:
In machine1 hdparm is not currently installed, but it was 1 year ago when the
machine1 had woody installed. I suppose hdparm does not change anything to
the disk itself but only to the ide modules of the kernel?
Hdparm is a powerful tool that can activate/deactivate some fe
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:03:31AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote:
>
> If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The advantage of posting it here is that it can be used as a measure of how
much spam does posting to a debian mailing attracts, spammers will probably
send some
#include
* Thomas Bushnell BSG [Mon, Feb 27 2006, 12:53:12PM]:
> I certainly do not think that the installer should be limited to
> software in main (and perhaps not even software in main+contrib,
> provided it still works correctly without non-free things around).
>
> Is that the root issue? A
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:06:51AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> However, some people like to define "Debian" just as "main" and use the
> main section as the single acceptable set of free software. Which
> is, of course, wrong, because requirements for contrib are defined by
> DFSG, exactly as for
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:46:07PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
> > user applications can use the whole 4GB of virtual address space while the
> > kernel runs it's own AS.
[...]
>
> Run "make menuconfig"; then, select "Processor type and features", and
> "High Memory Support". Done.
The q
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:59:17AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel,
> > it makes a lot of sense to release both in the same run.
>
> But it doesn't make sense to release them both as
[Please followup to -project; I am subscribed there, too, so you should
*not* Cc me.]
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 12:13 +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:59:46AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
>
> > [0] In case you're unsure, you can check the X-Spam-Status header, which
> > will
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:47:41 +0100]:
> Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this?
Why not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'? ('b' does (B)ounce
in the default keybindings). THat's what Cord asked for...
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
"Sergio Callegari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have this directory on an Ubuntu system and it seems to be present
on recent Debian systems too...
It is on tmpfs.
Can anybody tell me what is its purpose (as many other distros don't
have it) and when it gets moun
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I hereby appeal to the technical committee to reject to rule on this
> request, on the grounds that this is not a technical matter, and
> therefore falls outside the authority of the technical committee.
The Section: field of a De
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:04:17AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> I understand that different mail systems do different things (although I
> hope you're not using qmail[0]).
Not on my desktop, but I have no control over the institute's central
services.
> However, the code of conduct seems to
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:52:49PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > The correct way to proceed would seem to be a ruling by a body
> > authorized to make authoritative interpretations of the Social Contract,
> > or, failing t
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anybody blindly mirroring ALL of ftp.debian.org via http or ftp would
> > end up with
> > two copies of the major architectures.
> >
> > However, doing that is a stupid thing anyway, and Debian has no
> > obligat
I take issue with this because we [the xen team] have never excluded
anyone and have tried to get all those people interested in solid Debian
packages of xen to come forth and help. I spent a good amount of time
before actually forming the Alioth project attempting to get in touch
with peop
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The Section: field of a Debian package's control file is a technical detail
> of the package, as is the location of a package on the Debian mirror. You
> may consider that a particular decision has political motivations, but this
> may be true of many t
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:03:56AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> They can consider it, obviously. They cannot overrule ftp-masters on this
> matter, however. OTOH, ftp-masters may decide to listen to whatever the
> ctte recommends, but they don't *have* to.
They can consider it ind
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:46:02AM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:04:17AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> > However, the code of conduct seems to
> > point out that one should not Cc someone unless they specifically ask
> > for it (a guideline that you neglected to follow,
> I would like to ask whether there really is such a guideline, and if so,
> which are the technical / political reasons that lead to it. I have
Wearing my i18n hat, I can add one reason, certainly not THE reason
but yet another argument to avoid native packages except for
Debian-specific stuff
Scripsit Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 21:26 schrieb Henning Makholm:
>> Further, providing an .orig.tar.gz without the debian/ directory helps
>> prevent confusion for users on non-Debian systems.
> On the other side, some user may find it very useful.
Then
88 matches
Mail list logo
