On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:45:00AM -0500, Michael Poole wrote: > Bas Zoetekouw writes: > > > Hi Wouter! > > > > You wrote: > > > > > The correct way to proceed would seem to be a ruling by a body > > > authorized to make authoritative interpretations of the Social Contract, > > > or, failing that (since I believe we have no such body), a General > > > Resolution. > > > > Wouldn't the ftp-masters be the right authority for this issue? It is > > them who decide if the package can go into main or not. > > The package is already in main. The person who filed this bug thinks > the maintainer and ftp-master decisions were wrong and should be > changed or overruled.
Right. My take, however, is that they are not technical issues and are therefore not suited for the technical committee; since the body with authority over this interpretation already made a decision, the only way to overrule would seem to be a GR. No, I'm not willing to propose such a GR, because I do not think that overruling this decision is required. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]