On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:18:45AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:33:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Cool. Didn't know that. Then again, I've only been using MySQL since a
> > few years, so maybe it's normal that I didn't know.
>
> Which documentation did you use?
T
Hello Wouter,
* Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-16 11:56]:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:04:34PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hi,
> > does anyone knows a solution to let packages FTBFS on
> > buildd's which architecure are not supported by the
> > software?
>
> You want to read Policy
Hello Gergely,
* Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-16 11:56]:
> > does anyone knows a solution to let packages FTBFS on
> > buildd's which architecure are not supported by the
> > software?
>
> If the arch is not supported by the package, why is it in the packages
> Architecture: line to
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:19:12AM +0200, Ghislain Roggemans wrote:
> J'ai des listes de prix pour des milliers de cartouche que je vends avec
> des marges très faibles, je me propose donc de vous fournir vos
> cartouches et toners aux meilleurs prix du marché.
Wohoo! And a 1999,- USD donation fo
Sending to debian-devel because I would like to hear other people's
opinions. It's about #271428, as the subject says. Please keep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on CC (I assume GOTO reads -devel).
also sprach GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.16.1421 +0200]:
> Exactly, the problem is strftime. If yo
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:31:23AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:54:08AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > Case 1: foo = nvidia binary modules
> > Answer: Because these modules are binary-nonly and therefore
> > undebuggable for everyone except Nvidia. They give
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sending to debian-devel because I would like to hear other people's
> opinions. It's about #271428, as the subject says. Please keep
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on CC (I assume GOTO reads -devel).
>
> also sprach GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.16.1
also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.16.1552 +0200]:
> Therefore, any actual behavior (including the existing one as well
> as the suggested alternatives) would be standard conforming.
I don't think I was criticising standards compliance...
> >From a QoI point of view, I'd pref
On Saturday 16 April 2005 09:28 am, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The invariant section issues are things you can discuss inside Debian or
> with me or with the FSF. But for nearly everyone else the result if you
> explain the GFDL problem will be that he thinks that the differences
> between free and non-f
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.16.1552 +0200]:
>> Therefore, any actual behavior (including the existing one as well
>> as the suggested alternatives) would be standard conforming.
>
> I don't think I was criticising standards
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:10:10 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Debian's steps of moving more and more things into non-free forces many
> users to use non-free who wouldn't do otherwise.
>
> Is this effect really wanted?
Obviously not. One effect that is wanted is for users to have access to
an archi
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The invariant section issues are things you can discuss inside Debian or
> with me or with the FSF. But for nearly everyone else the result if you
> explain the GFDL problem will be that he thinks that the differences
> between free and non-free software are pretty small.
For
> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adrian> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:58:52AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
>> ... In fact, I've never looked at the gcc documentation other than
>> to look up machine-specific options and optimization flags. It's
>> easy to use gcc without the
quywe tonctostay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:09:08AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Different from what both I and several other people in this thread
> stated, the GPL is DFSG-free?
In my interpretation, yes.
--
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananoseco
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gnome-art
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Michael Gebhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.miketech.net/gnome-art/
* License : GPL
Description : install GNOME
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 06:14:58AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:15:29PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 04:29:42AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > > Is this wanted?
> > >
> > > This may not be wan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: boo
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Rodrigo B. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://boo.codehaus.org/
* License : Custom. DFSG Compatible.
Description : a pyth
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:54:08AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:35:36PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > You present some incredibly strange arguments: you're not arguing that the
> > gcc manual is Free, but instead, apparently, saying "we shouldn't move non-
>
> I'd perso
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> I read the policy, I know what it says.
Okay, good :)
(it would've helped if you had mentioned the following in your original
mail...)
* Jeroen:
> Please also try to make your package actually FTBFS on systems not
> supporting acpi, i
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>A more realistic example would be
>
>Answer: Because the document contains an invariant section on the
> author's opinion regarding the dangers of Software Patents in
> the European Union.
>
>Something like that simply is not free. It might be true at the time th
Am 2005-04-16 13:49:36, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:19:12AM +0200, Ghislain Roggemans wrote:
>
> > J'ai des listes de prix pour des milliers de cartouche que je vends avec
> > des marges très faibles, je me propose donc de vous fournir vos
> > cartouches et toners aux
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> > "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Adrian> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:58:52AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> >> ... In fact, I've never looked at the gcc documentation other than
> >> to look up machine-specifi
23 matches
Mail list logo
