On Saturday 16 April 2005 09:28 am, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The invariant section issues are things you can discuss inside Debian or > with me or with the FSF. But for nearly everyone else the result if you > explain the GFDL problem will be that he thinks that the differences > between free and non-free software are pretty small.
A lot of people can't understand why we would consider software that comes with source code, is freely distributable, and may be modified in any way to be non-free simply because its license states that you may not use it if you are a business/work at a nuclear plant/are a member of a neo-Nazi group. So, should we put software like that into main so that they don't "think the differences between free and non-free software are pretty small"? If not, I'm not sure I see what you're trying to say either. Daniel -- /------------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------\ | "Next, consider a circle passing through infinity; that | | is, a straight line.." | \------ (if (not (understand-this)) (go-to http://www.schemers.org)) -------/
pgpb3P83iKPYZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
