martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.16.1552 +0200]:
>> Therefore, any actual behavior (including the existing one as well
>> as the suggested alternatives) would be standard conforming.
>
> I don't think I was criticising standards compliance...

I didn't mean to say you did. But after reading the postings to the bug
report (well, to be honest, after skimming them quickly... :) ), it
seemed that nobody had yet looked up if the relevant standards do in
fact mandate any specific behavior for the case of an invalid TZ, so I
did that first. Apologies if I have missed something.

Martin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to