Re: Bug#553760: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev

2009-11-02 Thread Vincent Danjean
Hi, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > There is not bug here. Perhaps the scripts or tests you use need > to be tightened? > > The build dependency line reads (in part) > libreadline-dev | libreadline6-dev | libreadline5-dev, Just for record (I got the same 'bug' in one of my packag

Re: Bug#553760: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev

2009-11-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: fvwm > Version: 1:2.5.28.ds-2 > Severity: important > User: d...@debian.org > Usertags: readline6 > > Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html > As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well. Fin

Re: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev

2009-10-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 04:41:43PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 13 2009, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > > Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available > > > in unstable and testing. If possible,

Re: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev

2009-09-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13 2009, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available > > in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the > > libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadl

Re: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev

2009-09-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Sep 13 2009, Matthias Klose wrote: > Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available > in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the > libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in > future changes of the libreadline soname binNMU's can

Re: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev

2009-09-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, Matthias Klose wrote: > Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in > unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev > build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the > libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this

Re: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev

2009-09-13 Thread Zak B. Elep
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 14:28 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in > unstable > and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev build > dependency > with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the libreadline s

replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev

2009-09-13 Thread Matthias Klose
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this kind of update. Sending email