On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13 2009, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available > > in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the > > libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in > > future changes of the libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this > > kind of update. > > I had libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev, based on the premise > that the former would be a concrete package, and the latter not, but I > am now using > libreadline-dev | libreadline6-dev | libreadline5-dev > to be friendly to back porters (thus the prepend, not replace)
librealine-dev used to be a virtual package. If it is now a standard package, I don't even see why libreadline6-dev exists at all. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
