On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: fvwm
> Version: 1:2.5.28.ds-2
> Severity: important
> User: d...@debian.org
> Usertags: readline6
>
> Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
> As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Fine, sending to -devel as well.
> Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
> in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev
> build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the
> libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this kind of update.
There is not bug here. Perhaps the scripts or tests you use need
to be tightened?
The build dependency line reads (in part)
libreadline-dev | libreadline6-dev | libreadline5-dev,
Which means that the new packages are picked by default, but it
is also backports friendly, allowing backporters to still use
libreadline5-dev. This is strictly better than just using the new
dependencies. It does not prevent removing libreadline5-dev from
Squeeze, the package will continue to build just fine.
Closing the bug, with no changes.
manoj
--
You can't have everything... where would you put it? Steven Wright
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
