Re: Re^4: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-31 Thread Raul Miller
Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would prefer a flag in CONTROL. We have got a lot of programs with such > problems. For example it's no problem to sell programs with GIF support in > Germany, because there's not patent on this algorithm. > The crypt programs are another group. You're

Re^4: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-31 Thread Marco Budde
Am 29.12.97 schrieb harpo # udel.edu ... Moin Will! WL> Would it be allowed for us to have a non-duetch directory, which just WL> wouldn't get mirrored (be default) in Germany? That's ok. WL> That way, if a child gets WL> it, they've got to get it from someplace outside Germany, which the WL

Re: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-29 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Pfaff) wrote on 28.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is it sufficient to add to the Description something along the lines > of: > > If you are a German citizen less than 18 years old, you are > prohibited by law from using this program. > > or the equivalent translate

Re: Re^2: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-29 Thread Ben Pfaff
JH> Good grief. Well, it's already in non-free, I guess that's good enough JH> (since stuff in non-free cannot be safely distributed unless you examine JH> it's license). But non-free is mirrored on several FTP servers in Germany. And a child could download the games from a German

Re: Re^2: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-29 Thread Will Lowe
On 28 Dec 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Marco> But non-free is mirrored on several FTP servers in Germany. And > Marco> a child could download the games from a German FTP server and > Marco> this is not allowed. Would it be allowed for us to have a non-duetch directory, which just wouldn't get

Re: Re^2: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Marco" == Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marco> Am 27.12.97 schrieb joey # kitenet.net ... Marco> Moin Joey! JH> Good grief. Well, it's already in non-free, I guess that's good JH> enough (since stuff in non-free cannot be safely distributed JH> unless you examine it's license).

Re^2: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-28 Thread Marco Budde
Am 27.12.97 schrieb joey # kitenet.net ... Moin Joey! JH> Good grief. Well, it's already in non-free, I guess that's good enough JH> (since stuff in non-free cannot be safely distributed unless you examine JH> it's license). But non-free is mirrored on several FTP servers in Germany. And a child

Re: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-27 Thread Joey Hess
Marco Budde wrote: > Great, but then we need a new non-german section :). You're not allowed to > give doom and quake (!) to children younger than 18 years. Good grief. Well, it's already in non-free, I guess that's good enough (since stuff in non-free cannot be safely distributed unless you exa

Re: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-27 Thread Will Lowe
On 26 Dec 1997, Marco Budde wrote: > JH> Id released doom's source code today, so I will be able to make a current > JH> x11 elf build of doom. Due to copyright, it will go in non-free. I will > > Great, but then we need a new non-german section :). You're not allowed to > give doom and quake (

Re: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-27 Thread Marco Budde
Am 24.12.97 schrieb joey # kitenet.net ... Moin Joey! JH> Id released doom's source code today, so I will be able to make a current JH> x11 elf build of doom. Due to copyright, it will go in non-free. I will JH> probably pattern it after the quake packages, with a seperate package for JH> levels

Re: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-24 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
> Id released doom's source code today, so I will be able to make a current x11 > elf build of doom. Due to copyright, it will go in non-free. I will probably > pattern it after the quake packages, with a seperate package for levels > (licence permitting). Please, svgalib version too!! =) -- T

intent to package: doom!

1997-12-24 Thread Joey Hess
Id released doom's source code today, so I will be able to make a current x11 elf build of doom. Due to copyright, it will go in non-free. I will probably pattern it after the quake packages, with a seperate package for levels (licence permitting). -- see shy jo -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAI