Re: mudlet bug #787354: icon had wrong license

2015-06-12 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:13:59PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 20:50 +1000 schrieb Craig Small: > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > With my SRM hat on, we're generally happy to consider the issue resolved > > > if > > > the packag

Re: mudlet bug #787354: icon had wrong license

2015-06-12 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 20:50 +1000 schrieb Craig Small: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > With my SRM hat on, we're generally happy to consider the issue resolved if > > the package in unstable contains the correct license information and the > > file(s) in

Re: mudlet bug #787354: icon had wrong license

2015-06-12 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > With my SRM hat on, we're generally happy to consider the issue resolved if > the package in unstable contains the correct license information and the > file(s) involved are other distributable, as at that point it's basically a > d

Re: mudlet bug #787354: icon had wrong license

2015-06-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2015-06-08 13:41, Craig Small wrote: I'm trying to work out what would be the best way forward for this. mudlet has an icon, mudlet.svg which had a cc-by-nc-sa license. I reported it to upstream who basically said "oh yeah, we stuffed up, not sure how it got there, fixed now". Do I need to