On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:13:59PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 20:50 +1000 schrieb Craig Small: > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > With my SRM hat on, we're generally happy to consider the issue resolved > > > if > > > the package in unstable contains the correct license information and the > > > file(s) involved are other distributable, as at that point it's basically > > > a > > > documentation issue rather than a licensing one. Assuming that's the case, > > > no separate update for Jessie would be required. > > Thanks, I'll document and downgrade (to make it non-RC) the bug. > > Yes, its a purely a documentation issue. > > Ähm, just a question: the license is *non-commercial*. Is it really > distributable in main then? I'd guessed not, but I'm happy to learn > something new... It's a documentation issue, not a license issue. ie what is written is not what they wanted to say.
Essentially: Me: "Hey this is a NC license" Them: "Oops, sorry, its supposed to be GPL" - Craig -- Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150612231546.gb11...@enc.com.au
