On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > With my SRM hat on, we're generally happy to consider the issue resolved if > the package in unstable contains the correct license information and the > file(s) involved are other distributable, as at that point it's basically a > documentation issue rather than a licensing one. Assuming that's the case, > no separate update for Jessie would be required. Thanks, I'll document and downgrade (to make it non-RC) the bug. Yes, its a purely a documentation issue.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/mudlet/+bug/1404763 -- Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150612105047.gb8...@enc.com.au
