Re: libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome

2005-08-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > I'm about to remove the libxslt1 package, which has been created a long > time ago for backward compatibility, when upstream did screw up ABI and > removed support for the libxsltbreakpoint library. > Now that no package depend on it,

Re: libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome

2005-08-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:40:41PM -0500, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that > > leaves a libxslt1.1 package alone, not really respectful of the debian > > s

Re: libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome

2005-08-11 Thread Graham Wilson
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that > leaves a libxslt1.1 package alone, not really respectful of the debian > standards for package naming. How is it not respectful of Debian standards for package namin