Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages

2008-02-24 Thread Marvin Renich
* Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080224 09:18]: > Bas Zoetekouw writes ("Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages"): > > Why a recommends? In order to satisfy the spirit of policy ("every > > binary must have a man page") it would need to be a depends,

Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages

2008-02-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Bas Zoetekouw writes ("Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages"): > Why a recommends? In order to satisfy the spirit of policy ("every > binary must have a man page") it would need to be a depends, imo. I think the point of policy is to ensure the manpage exists,

Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages

2008-02-16 Thread Harshula
Hi, Answers: a) Yes, they are *really* distributed in three separate tarballs. b) The three tarballs are not released in sync. Conclusion: 1) a.deb & b.deb shall depend on c.deb 2) a.deb & b.deb shall contain lintian overrides. Thanks for the useful feedback! [NOTE: If replying, please keep m

Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages

2008-02-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 14/02/2008, Russ Allbery wrote: > I thought that tag in lintian already had a note that you should add > an override if the man pages are shipped in a different package on > which this package has a dependency. Apparently I was just imagining > things. ISTR it's the case for icons in desktop/me

Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages

2008-02-14 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Josselin! You wrote: > Le vendredi 15 février 2008 à 03:04 +1100, Harshula a écrit : > > 1) a.tar.gz -> a.deb > > 2) b.tar.gz -> b.deb > > 3) c.tar.gz -> c.deb > > > > c.tar.gz contains only documentation, including man pages for > > binaries/scripts in a.tar.gz and b.tar.gz. > > Then a and

Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages

2008-02-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Harshula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since c.deb contains all the man pages, running lintian on a.deb results > in: > --- > W: m17n-db: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/m17n-db > N: > N: Each binary in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /sb

Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages

2008-02-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 15 février 2008 à 03:04 +1100, Harshula a écrit : > 1) a.tar.gz -> a.deb > 2) b.tar.gz -> b.deb > 3) c.tar.gz -> c.deb > > c.tar.gz contains only documentation, including man pages for > binaries/scripts in a.tar.gz and b.tar.gz. Then a and b should Recommend: c, regardless of how the

Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages

2008-02-14 Thread Felipe Sateler
Harshula wrote: > Hi, > > re: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s12.1 > --- > Each program, utility, and function should have an associated manual > page included in the same package. It is suggested that all > con

Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages

2008-02-14 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
Hi Firstly, this kind of question would be better suited in the debian-mentors list. Harshula wrote: > Here's the example: > > 1) a.tar.gz -> a.deb > 2) b.tar.gz -> b.deb > 3) c.tar.gz -> c.deb > Are they really distributed in three separate upstream tarballs? If they are, perhaps it would be

Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages

2008-02-14 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 14 févr. 08 à 17:04, Harshula a écrit : Hi, re: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s12.1 --- Each program, utility, and function should have an associated manual page included in the same package. [...] --