Re: Debian-devel

Debian-devel, it's my new email.

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2023 #271

Unsubscribe On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 1:33 PM < debian-devel-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org> wrote: > Content-Type: text/plain > > debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 2023 : > Issue 271 > > Today's Topics: > Re: Proposed MBF: Removal of libfree [ Hugh McMaster >Bu

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2022 #312

Il giorno ven 19 ago 2022 alle 16:11:28 +00:00:00, debian-devel-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org ha scritto: muon-build seems more consistent with its own domain name muon.build, the reference meson implementation's domain name mesonbuild.com, and their shared dependency ninja being packaged

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2021 #237

Unsubscribe On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:21 AM, wrote: > Empty Message

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2017 #417

Happy Birthday! *Александр Лебедев* <*downfal8*@*gmail**.com*>; wer464544-downfal8 *ID*:*C87BD478* *1851 9261 1B9C 3266 CBE8494F EA78 B09E C87B D478* *comment*(*-*) 2017-08-22 2:42 GMT+03:00 : > Content-Type: text/plain > > debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 2017 : >

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2017 #218

Hi, alexander lebedev about.me/wer464544 2017-04-21 17:39 GMT+03:00 : > Content

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2015 #297

Now I've got: SMTP send failure: (550, 'No valid sender found in the From:, Sender: and Reply-to: headers'). Do you want to retry (or else save the report and exit)? [Y|n|q|?]? ? Can I simply send the generated message via my favorite e-mail client? (The maintainer address is dif

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2011 #156

SlieiWorksw9sw9ssmzpbbbmpmm 2011.03.02. 14:47 ezt írta ( < debian-devel-digest-request@liskkkmmsķmts.debian.org>):May9p >ö9p > Content-Type: text/k >' > debian-devel-digest 😞o x 'Volume 2011 : Issue 156oipjlbojijl >m'> Today's Topics: > Re: potential MBF: first

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2011 #156

K 2011.03.02. 14:47 ezt írta ( ): > Content-Type: text/plain > > debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 2011 : > Issue 156 > > Today's Topics: > Re: potential MBF: first alternate d [ Scott Kitterman >Re: Potential memory leaks reported [ sean finney > ] > Re: P

Re: debian-devel-requests unresponsive

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:32:30PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:52:01AM +, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > > Hi have tried to unscribe my self from this list 5 times now but now luck. > > Can some fix this ? > > > > Let's see if I can reproduce it ... > Nope, it

Re: debian-devel-requests unresponsive

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:52:01AM +, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > Hi have tried to unscribe my self from this list 5 times now but now luck. > Can some fix this ? > Let's see if I can reproduce it ... Geert Stappers (Yes, it is me) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lis

Re: debian-devel-requests unresponsive

On Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > Hi have tried to unscribe my self from this list 5 times now but now luck. > Can some fix this ? I created an unsubscription cookie for you, please follow the instructions in it to unsubscribe. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-

Re: debian-devel-requests unresponsive

On 2015-03-17 10:52, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > Hi have tried to unscribe my self from this list 5 times now but now luck. > Can some fix this ? > > > WIth kind regards, > > > Bas van den Dikkenberg > Hi Bas, Have you tried contacting listmas...@lists.debian.org ? ~Niels -- To UNSU

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2014 #806

On 11/07/2014 05:07 PM, debian-devel-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote: Subject: so long and thanks for all the fish From: Joey Hess Date: 11/07/2014 04:04 PM To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org It's become abundantly clear that this is no longer the project I originally joined in 1996. We'

Re: [debian-devel:18459] Bug#697421: ITP: unidic-mecab -- free Japanese Dictionaries for mecab

Hi, I thought about this package at one point but I did not since its real upstream Japanese government agency had very restrictive license. http://www.tokuteicorpus.jp/ (Japanese pages) http://www.tokuteicorpus.jp/dist/ Version 1.3.12 http://www.tokuteicorpus.jp/dist/modules/system/m

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2012 #1259

Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: debian-devel-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org To: Subject: debian-devel-digest Digest V2012 #1259 Date: Fri, Nov 30, 2012 4:47 AM 2012/11/29 Wouter Verhelst : > glibc and the kernel is developed by the same group of companies. Both > interact ve

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2012 #1225

Can you please remove me from this mailing list. I've un-subscribed a number of times but I'm still receiving them. Thanks On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 02:15:50 -, wrote: Content-Type: text/plain debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 2012 : Issue 1225 Today's Topics

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2012 #2

On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 10:55 -0800, Dean Sorenson wrote: > I have a concept for a kernel that would probably help quite a bit. [...] Never reply to a digest, as it is generally impossible to tell which message you are replying to. If you have suggestions to make regarding the kernel packages in De

Re: [debian-devel:17493] Re: Japanese Font Transition (step for applications)

Hi, 2008/11/20 Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:11:18 +0100, > Josselin Mouette wrote: >> >> [1 ] >> Le mercredi 19 novembre 2008 à 00:43 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit : >> > - libpango1.0-common >> >> Fixed in our SVN. >> >> > If you have a question, please

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V2007 #198

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 198 Today's Topics: Draft spec for new dpkg "triggers" f [ Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Some fairly usel

Re: debian-devel-announce

Cryptic message and, if that meant that you joined Canonical, definitely the wrong venue to announce it. Use your blog via the Planet for that. On Fri, September 1, 2006 3:23, Adeodato Simó said: > Puedo morir en paz. > I just shook hands with my Benevolent Dictator. > 20060831171819+"CEST" is n

Re: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > Hi Milan, Jon, > > As discussed, 'the Debian project' as such has huge difficulties accepting > hardware donations - offers are often turned down. (tangent - in my opinion > donations should be accepted more liberally and if the Debian > administrato

Re: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

Hi Milan, Jon, As discussed, 'the Debian project' as such has huge difficulties accepting hardware donations - offers are often turned down. (tangent - in my opinion donations should be accepted more liberally and if the Debian administrators can not be bothered to administer yet another machin

Re: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > I saw a comment a few days back that vore was back up (see below). this really should be in the hosts database, it is hard to find information if it is that distributed. Thanks Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Re: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

On 29/12/2005, at 8:22 AM, Frans Pop wrote: A general note to everybody thinking of making hardware donations. On Wednesday 28 December 2005 21:23, Milan P. Stanic wrote: I could try to arrange donation of one UltraSparc machine to Debian project. I think that the transport would be to compli

Re: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

On Wednesday 28 December 2005 23:21, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > The issue threatening the Debian Sparc port is not so much lack of > > hardware (and certainly not older hardware), but rather people who > > spend time on hunting down and fixing (kernel) bu

Re: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The issue threatening the Debian Sparc port is not so much lack of > hardware (and certainly not older hardware), but rather people who spend > time on hunting down and fixing (kernel) bugs and working on architecture > specific packages like silo. Do

Re: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

A general note to everybody thinking of making hardware donations. On Wednesday 28 December 2005 21:23, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > I could try to arrange donation of one UltraSparc machine to Debian > project. I think that the transport would be to complicated from > Serbia to anywhere (because of o

Re: [debian-devel] Is SZALAY Attila MIA?

It is common for developers to be buried in other work, I know, I often get this way, it is understandable. However, it has now been several months and as section 3.4 of the Developers Reference says: its important "... to let the others know that you're unavailable." So, I think it is appropriate

Re: [debian-devel] Is SZALAY Attila MIA?

Hi! He is just overworked a bit, just like me. Trying to do something soon. Sorry. -- GNU GPL: csak tiszta forrásból

Re: [debian-devel] Re: FW: A Call to Action in OASIS

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 02:53:49PM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote: > A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader a > következ?eket írta: > > * Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-23 09:18]: > > > > A Call to Action in OASIS > > > Debian has a representative in OASIS

Re: [debian-devel] Re: FW: A Call to Action in OASIS

A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader a következőeket írta: > * Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-23 09:18]: > > > A Call to Action in OASIS > > Debian has a representative in OASIS doesn't it? > > Yes (Mark Johnson); I already mailed him to ask for his c

Re: debian-devel-changes question/request

Marek Habersack wrote: > It's just a simple question/request. Would it be possible to include > custom headers in the messages sent to debian-devel-changes that would > contain the package name, version and distribution, like so: > > X-Debian-Package: foo > X-Debian-PackageVersion: 1.2.3-1 >

Re: [developers-l] Re: [debian-devel] Re: security enhanced debian branch?

Hi! On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 06:39:28PM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote: > A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Matt Zimmerman a k?vetkez?eket ?rta: > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:07:02AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > > Second, any such effort shouldn't be a branch, but should be mainstreamed > > > in > >

Re: [debian-devel] Re: security enhanced debian branch?

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:39, Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this kind of stuff could be handled in new architectures. For > example the Adamantix project could be merged back by creating > an architecture i386-adamantix for the stack protected stuff, and > the other parts being

Re: [debian-devel] Re: security enhanced debian branch?

A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Matt Zimmerman a következőeket írta: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:07:02AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > > Second, any such effort shouldn't be a branch, but should be mainstreamed > > in > > Debian proper. Please see http://wiki.debian.net/CustomDebian for a > > p

Re: [debian-devel] Re: (last) Assurance measures: AMA (coping with the speed of OSS development)

A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Javier Fernández-Sanguino Pe?a a következőeket írta: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:21:20PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:50:43PM +0100, Magosányi Árpád wrote: > > What was your intent in posting all of these messages? > > He probably expects

Re: [debian-devel] Re: more details on the recent compromise of debian.org machines

A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Matt Zimmerman a következőeket írta: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 10:08:45AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > > In the final announcement I would add also a statement about reducing the > > number of trust relations between the machines and perhaps limiting shell > > acce

Re: [debian-devel] Re: Bits from the RM

On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 18:12, Magosányi Árpád wrote: > A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Zenaan Harkness a következőeket írta: > > Can "requesting removal from archive" be automated, to occur say after 3 > > weeks of inactivity of rc/grave/serious bug? > > > > As a DD, I assume there is some pride and/ o

Re: [debian-devel] Re: Bits from the RM

A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Zenaan Harkness a következőeket írta: > Can "requesting removal from archive" be automated, to occur say after 3 > weeks of inactivity of rc/grave/serious bug? > > As a DD, I assume there is some pride and/ or utility in having your > package in the archive. This would

Re: [debian-devel] Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:04:49PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Magosányi Árpád wrote: > > > A levelez??m azt hiszi, hogy Florian Weimer a következ??eket írta: > > > Let me rephrase my statement. "non-free" does not mean "not > > > conforming to the law". > > > > Non-free does mean "not confor

Re: [debian-devel] Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?

MagosÃnyi ÃrpÃd wrote: > A levelezÅm azt hiszi, hogy Florian Weimer a kÃvetkezÅeket Ãrta: > > Let me rephrase my statement. "non-free" does not mean "not conforming > > to the law". > > Non-free does mean "not conforming to the internal law of the project". The Social Contract mandates that Deb

Re: [debian-devel] Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?

A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Florian Weimer a következőeket írta: > Let me rephrase my statement. "non-free" does not mean "not conforming > to the law". Non-free does mean "not conforming to the internal law of the project". -- GNU GPL: csak tiszta forrásból

Re: [debian-devel] what is the family of ......

Hi! [Courtesy of Sas on the hungarian debian list] http://www.whatsthatbug.com/potato.html :) A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Caitlin Riddle a következőeket írta: > What family is the potato bug in? > Because I saw one in my back yard. > It was reaaly freaky. > Tell me . -- GNU GPL: csak tiszta f

Re: [debian-devel] Re: A case study of a new user turned off debian

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:48:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote: > I guess having kernel-image-vanilla and/or > kernel-image-onlybugfix in debian would not hurt. Or kernel-image-hx ... what caught me out was believing kernel-image-2.4.xx or whatever was relatively pristine. However naive that make

Re: [debian-devel] Re: A case study of a new user turned off debian

A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy [EMAIL PROTECTED] a következőeket írta: > > > but I wouldn't touch Herbert's kernels with a ten-feet pole. [] > a) I can do better Please do then. I guess having kernel-image-vanilla and/or kernel-image-onlybugfix in debian would not hurt. > b) I don't do

Re: [debian-devel] Re: netkit-inetd in sarge

Hi! If you are at it, please also arrange that netbase do not depend on any network daemons. I guess lot of us want to have /etc/services, but do not want inetd and portmapper. Thank you. 2003-10-18, szo keltezéssel Marco d'Itri ezt írta: > On Oct 18, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [debian-devel] Re: perm of etc/zorp/ is 0700

2003-10-15, sze keltezéssel Ben Collins ezt írta: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:51:14PM +0200, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote: > > /etc/zorp is mode 0700 in upstream. In a typical setup, almost > > every single file under this directory contains sensitive information: > If the directory is justified, then t

Re: [debian-devel] Re: APT: Errors when replacing syslog by syslog-ng

A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Matt Zimmerman a következőeket írta: > > - - syslog-ng is started, then stopped and then started again, why? > > Also pretty harmless, and syslog-ng's fault. The upload closing this bug is ready, and slowly crawles up to master. BTW how much is it decent to wait befor

Re: [debian-devel] Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

2003-10-15, sze keltezéssel Matthew Palmer ezt írta: > It's not as though anyone is going to beat you up because of a Lintian > warning. Are we having "my package is cleaner than yours" contests? (Maybe > we should, considering some of the crud I've seen in NMUs I've built). I have always thoug

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > know the latest policy version. IMHO it is a lintian bug to hardcode the > policy version to check against instead at least verifying an installed > policy version. IBTD. It is feature, you get nice warning that some of lintian's warnings might be

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:23:24PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: >Just for an example where it annoys me: I use lintian.d.o as a summary > of my lintian warnings because it gives me a nice overview of what needs > to be done, and I always need to manually filter out newer-standards- > version warn

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > People in general seem to get unnecessarily het up about Lintian > warnings. They're intended as advice to be read and understood by > humans, not as things you should be blindly counting. Just for an example where it annoys me: I use lintian.d.o as

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:31:01PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > >Try reading upgrading-checklist.txt. > > > > Where do I get a copy of this document? A summery of what to check > > for when updating a packa

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 10:21:07PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > [lintian warnings about newer-standards-version] > > It is not fair to issue warnings against a package if the warning > > should be intended to the checker itself. >

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: [lintian warnings about newer-standards-version] > It is not fair to issue warnings against a package if the warning should be > intended to the checker itself. It's not as though anyone is going to beat you up because of a Lintian war

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > Not really; the people complaining about newer-standards-version serve > to remind the lintian maintainer that he needs to update lintian for any > changes in policy. :) Updating lintian is not just a matter of > increasing the number. Well for sure. But

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:32:20AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > You assign way too much value to the latest two revisions. Try reading > > upgrading-checklist.txt. In general, relying on automated tools to check > > packages, rather than inspecting th

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:32:20AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Josip Rodin wrote: > > You assign way too much value to the latest two revisions. Try reading > > upgrading-checklist.txt. In general, relying on automated tools to check > > packages, rather than inspecting them

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Josip Rodin wrote: > You assign way too much value to the latest two revisions. Try reading > upgrading-checklist.txt. In general, relying on automated tools to check > packages, rather than inspecting them manually based on actual (*gasp*!) > knowledge of policy, isn't partic

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:31:01PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > >Try reading upgrading-checklist.txt. > > Where do I get a copy of this document? A summery of what to check > for when updating a package would be very useful. (I've just agreed > to ta

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >Try reading upgrading-checklist.txt. Where do I get a copy of this document? A summery of what to check for when updating a package would be very useful. (I've just agreed to take over a few more packages, two which havn't been updated since woody.) -

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:00:31PM +0200, Magosányi Árpád wrote: > Anyway I feel it is a pity that the almost-stable distribution > does not contain a checker for the current policy which is > in effect since at least two months. You assign way too much value to the latest two revisions. Try readi

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On 14-Oct-03, 07:00 (CDT), Magos?nyi ?rp?d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which road will you take to make linda fall into testing? Why do you need it in testing? The whole point of it is to run against packages you are building, and you should be building in unstable. Steve -- Steve Greenland

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

At 10:05 pm, Tuesday, October 14 2003, Magos?nyi ?rp?d mumbled: > Which road will you take to make linda fall into testing? > Wait until python2.3 provides python (>= 2.3), or change > the dependencies of linda? > I'm going to wait. Like I usually do. > Anyway I feel it is a pity that the almost-

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

Hi! Please take my apologies for "spreading lies". Linda in sid does check against policy version 3.6.1 . Which road will you take to make linda fall into testing? Wait until python2.3 provides python (>= 2.3), or change the dependencies of linda? Anyway I feel it is a pity that the almost-stabl

Re: [debian-devel] Re: APT: Errors when replacing syslog by syslog-ng

Hi! The doubled restart of syslog-ng is already reported as bug #204631 Will try to sort out RSN. A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Josip Rodin a következőeket írta: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 04:54:07PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > I just got the following messages replacing syslog by syslog-ng from >

Re: [debian-devel] Future releases of Debian

>--[Halil Demirezen]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For example, I came accross a segfault with micq. However, I could not find > the reason for this bug. Why i pointed out this is that there may be a > probable > bug there. If you're the one who found the unreproducible segfault, then filing a bug rep

Re: [debian-devel] micq code audit discontinued

>--[Martin Godisch]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Due to problems communicating with micq's upstream maintainer Don't expect me to respond to a mail basically just reading "say something". If you have a question not already answered 100times, then ask it, but don't come up with a contentless "question"

Re: [debian-devel] Packages with i18n support disabled

On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:56:32PM +0200, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote: > >--[Denis Barbier]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:39:09PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > Many thanks to those who replied, here is an updated list. > > Btw, did you also check for packages that don't conta

Re: [debian-devel] Packages with i18n support disabled

>--[Denis Barbier]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:39:09PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > Many thanks to those who replied, here is an updated list. Btw, did you also check for packages that don't contain the upstream provided translated man pages? Because often, upstream doesn't

Re: [debian-devel] Questions regarding utf-8

>--[Andreas Metzler]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > glyphs iconv returns? My locale is C. What locale are you using? > [...] > de_AT (uses ISO-8859-1 as charset). > LANG=de_AT, everything else is unset: > *promp

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-23 03:30]: > > If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of > > Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning > > their use of Debian, not just the application. > > No. They would b

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 09:24:14AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-23 03:30]: > > If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of > > Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning > > their use of Debian, not jus

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

Gerfried Fuchs wrote: * Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-23 03:30]: If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning their use of Debian, not just the application. No. They would be justified in que

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

* Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-23 03:30]: > If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of > Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning > their use of Debian, not just the application. No. They would be justified in questioning their o

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:26:13 +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Harmful to Debian even if possibly not harmful to the user. This > could be clarified in the next DWN article on the topic (now that > Rudi has started the debate again another DWN article is probably > due anyway).

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:25, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > I wouldn't call it malicious, but I question the use of the word "harmful". > It should have been replaced, attributed or removed. I wondered about it > at the time but didn't comment as the article had already been released. > But maybe it can

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:25:11PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > I wouldn't call it malicious, but I question the use of the word "harmful". I don't. Some people do use these applications for purposes more important than chatting with friends. If someone missed a meeting because a program t

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:25:11PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > > I wouldn't call it malicious, but I question the use of the word "harmful". > > I would definitely consider an easter egg that disables the package > to be "harmful". By contrast

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:25:11PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > I wouldn't call it malicious, but I question the use of the word "harmful". I would definitely consider an easter egg that disables the package to be "harmful". By contrast, an easter egg that makes a little penguin dance aroun

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:57:25 +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:07, Rdiger Kuhlmann wrote: > > d) the libel published in the Debian Weekly News of 2003-02-18; cf > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200302/msg01391.html > > > > .. none of those can be fix

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:36:30PM +0200, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote: > It's kinda overdue, which is why I'm asking. I now have the missing > translations for a few new strings so that I can activate the code that uses > them in the stable branch. But the fixes are not that many yet that waiting > for

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

>--[Robert Lemmen]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:07:28PM +0200, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote: > > > couple of non-intentional errors (buffer overruns, null-dereferences, etc) > > If you really found some that haven't been fixed in the meanwhile, you could > > send them to me so that

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:07:28PM +0200, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote: > > couple of non-intentional errors (buffer overruns, null-dereferences, etc) > > If you really found some that haven't been fixed in the meanwhile, you could > send them to me so that I can fix them for the next update. we wanted

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:07, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote: > c) the slander on this mailing list, in particular by Steve Langasek, > Russel Cooker and Manoj Srivastava Unable to spell? Which statements made by me, Steve, and Manoj do you claim to be false? Why do you believe that I want to maliciously d

Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit

>--[Robert Lemmen]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Martin Loschwitz wrote: > > can you please inform the list and me about the current status of the > > mICQ code audit you two wanted to do? It's been a while and I didn't > > hear anything further from you since

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V102 #11

>-- >Content-Type: text/plain >debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 102 : Issue 11 >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Today's Topics: > Re: bogus maintainers?

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V102 #11

>-- >Content-Type: text/plain >debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 102 : Issue 11 >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Today's Topics: > Re: bogus maintainers?

Re: [Debian-devel]Compiling Kernel on SPARC 2.2(potato)) -> 2.4.9

On Sun 09 Sep 2001, marc herren wrote: > > I've got the following problem when compiling a new Kernel on my SPARC20 > workstation. > > make vmlinux -> > > ... > make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/char' > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wn

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V101 #59

Really really nice! [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/10/2001 01:29:39 PM Please respond to debian-devel@lists.debian.org To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: debian-devel-digest Digest V101 #59 Content-Type: text/plain debian-devel-digest DigestVolume 101 : Issue 59 Today'

Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V99 #1154

How do I unsubscribe? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 17, 1999 11:05 AM Subject: debian-devel-digest Digest V99 #1154

Re: Debian-devel subscriber count

"Simon's Mailing List Account" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I'm not a developer (yet), but am in the process of switching > various servers from Redhat to Debian, and wanted to get a feel for > how active the developer community is. Hope we didn't disappoint :> -- Rob Browning <[EMAIL PR

Re: Debian-devel subscriber count

Well, I'm not a developer (yet), but am in the process of switching various servers from Redhat to Debian, and wanted to get a feel for how active the developer community is. Let's just say that it's not an 'if', but a 'when' (i.e. after I finish dealing with a major upgrade on an SGI) Probably th

Re: Debian-devel subscriber count

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Date: Saturday, December 13, 1997 2:39 PM Subject: Debian-devel subscriber count >Goodness gracious. Debian-devel has >400 subscribers. Must be a lot of >lurkers. > > Bruce > > >-- >TO UNSUB

Re: Debian-devel subscriber count

> > Here's one lurker sticking his head up for a second. I lurk so I get some > picture of what's happening on the hamm front, beyond what I get on > debian-user. I don't post because I don't develop (yet ;). At the risk of posting a gratuitous message, me too. I like running my machine near t

Re: Debian-devel subscriber count

Here's one lurker sticking his head up for a second. I lurk so I get some picture of what's happening on the hamm front, beyond what I get on debian-user. I don't post because I don't develop (yet ;). TL On 13 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: debian-devel@lists