Le Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:45:27AM +0100, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
>
> There was at some point a discussion about a collaborative copyright
> proofread.
> I think this would be a great improvement in our workflow. What was the
> conclusion of this proposal ?
Hi Romain,
the proposal is here: ht
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:21:50PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Well, licensecheck(1) exists. Maybe many packagers don't know it?
Well, licensecheck is a unreplaceable tool, but it cannot be a unique
ressource for copyright/license checking, as it suffers from bugs
(and/or unknown patterns)
Le Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:21:50PM +0100, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
>
> Well, licensecheck(1) exists. Maybe many packagers don't know it?
Hi Daniel,
I would rather think that one reason for defective debian/copyright files are
the false negatives of licensecheck ;) `grep -ri copyright .' is more
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 00:15 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Although it should never happen, sometimes a new package we submit to our
> archive managers is rejected because the description of the copyright status
> of
> its files is either incorrect or lacunar. This is waste of precious
Hello everybody,
Although it should never happen, sometimes a new package we submit to our
archive managers is rejected because the description of the copyright status of
its files is either incorrect or lacunar. This is waste of precious time for
everybody. In order to ameliorate the quality of o
5 matches
Mail list logo
