Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 00:15 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy: > Although it should never happen, sometimes a new package we submit to our > archive managers is rejected because the description of the copyright status > of > its files is either incorrect or lacunar. This is waste of precious time for > everybody. In order to ameliorate the quality of our submissions, I propose to > introduce a dose of optional pre-submission peer review. > > One may wonder why not reviewing all QA aspects of a package? One reason is > that this requires skills that are not evenly distributed,
Well, licensecheck(1) exists. Maybe many packagers don't know it? [..] > PS: and of course, consider using the machine-readable format if you have not > tried yet: http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat Would be nice to have a licensecheck mode to compare debian/copyright to the checked source. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
