Re: Two new architectures bootstrapping in unstable - MBF coming soon

2014-08-28 01:55 Wookey: +++ Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo [2014-08-27 20:25 +0100]: Congrats! The sooner that you graduate out of debian-ports, the better for other architectures that want to get into ;-) -- although arm64 is still there, for some reasons. We are using the binaries in debia

Re: Two new architectures bootstrapping in unstable - MBF coming soon

+++ Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo [2014-08-27 20:25 +0100]: > > Congrats! The sooner that you graduate out of debian-ports, the > better for other architectures that want to get into ;-) -- although > arm64 is still there, for some reasons. We are using the binaries in debian-ports to help boots

Re: Two new architectures bootstrapping in unstable - MBF coming soon

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:25:45PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > 2014-08-27 02:46 Wookey: > >Hi folks, > > > >We are excited to announce that in the last two weeks two new > >architectures have been added to the archive: arm64 and ppc64el. > >[..

Re: Two new architectures bootstrapping in unstable - MBF coming soon

2014-08-27 02:46 Wookey: Hi folks, We are excited to announce that in the last two weeks two new architectures have been added to the archive: arm64 and ppc64el. [...] A lot of people are working hard to get them to a releasable state in time for Jessie. Congrats! The sooner that you

Re: New architectures

> Joerg Jaspert disait : > >> we just added two new architectures to the Debian archive. Everybody >> please welcome > >> kfreebsd-i386 AKA GNU/kFreeBSD i386 >> kfreebsd-amd64 AKA GNU/kFreeBSD amd64 Hi Joerg, What should be done with amd64-libs and ia32-li

Re: New architectures

Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du dimanche 05 avril 2009, vers 17:53, > Paul Wise disait : > >>> How packages that run on Linux only should handle those new architectures? > >> Same as for stuff that only runs on i386; port them to kFre

Re: New architectures

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du dimanche 05 avril 2009, vers 17:53, Paul Wise disait : >> How packages that run on Linux only should handle those new architectures? > Same as for stuff that only runs on i386; port them to kFreeBSD or > restrict them to linux architectures and a

Re: New architectures

On 11711 March 1977, Vincent Bernat wrote: > How packages that run on Linux only should handle those new architectures? The same as with any other portability problem. Either fix it, or if it really doesn't work out mark it as such. P-a-s is one way for it. -- bye, Joerg I've an

Re: New architectures

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > How packages that run on Linux only should handle those new architectures? Same as for stuff that only runs on i386; port them to kFreeBSD or restrict them to linux architectures and add them to P-a-s. -- bye, pabs h

Re: New architectures

OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 05 avril 2009, vers 16:23, Joerg Jaspert disait : > we just added two new architectures to the Debian archive. Everybody > please welcome > kfreebsd-i386 AKA GNU/kFreeBSD i386 > kfreebsd-amd64 AKA GNU/kFreeBSD amd64 > No

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 11:08:10AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:38:20PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > > So there is ONE w-b for {i386,ppc,...) and there is one buildd for each > > arch that connects to that ONE w-b? > > No. There is one system where wanna-build databases

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:38:20PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > So there is ONE w-b for {i386,ppc,...) and there is one buildd for each > arch that connects to that ONE w-b? No. There is one system where wanna-build databases are stored. That single one wanna-build system has, of course, multiple da

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

Hi Kevin, On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:38:20PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > Hi Aurélien G, (sorry for the bad conversion by mutt) No problem, I am still not an UTF-8 guy, so my local ISO-8859-15 encoding is the culprit for you. ;) > So there is ONE w-b for {i386,ppc,...) and there is one buildd for

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:41:49PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:17:52PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > > it is my understanding that each arch has its own wanna-build that uses > > its own copy of a p-a-s file. So, that would mean that there would have > > to be m

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

Hi, On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:01:41PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Someone else (lamont) did the changes I requested on p-a-s; now the > only remaining problem is that the buildds are not taking the new > version of p-a-s into account, because they can't talk to the CVS > pserver. It seems it

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

Hi, On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:17:52PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > it is my understanding that each arch has its own wanna-build that uses > its own copy of a p-a-s file. So, that would mean that there would have > to be more than one copy updated. If this is not the case, then could > some enlight

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:17:52PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > > Someone else (lamont) did the changes I requested on p-a-s; now the > > only remaining problem is that the buildds are not taking the new > > version of p-a-s into account, because they can't talk to the CVS > > pserver. > it is my un

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:18:06PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes: > But it's not you I need to convince, it is Ryan or whoever admins the > CVS pserver where P-a-s is. I am also curious, like Kevin Mark, to > understand the buildd infrastructure better. > > -- Hi Ludovic, my

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

Kurt Roeckx writes: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> >> This issue has been blocking the Ada transition (19 source packages, >> 11 RC bugs) for about 3 weeks now, and I'd really like to be able to >> proceed. > > I don't see how this can be blocking a transition

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > > This issue has been blocking the Ada transition (19 source packages, > 11 RC bugs) for about 3 weeks now, and I'd really like to be able to > proceed. I don't see how this can be blocking a transition. Please just do it for the

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:01:41PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Michael Banck writes: > > Couldn't you get the problematic outdated packages (I assume this is > > the case if you're talking about [testing?] transitions) removed > > temporarily? > > No, that would not solve the problem. The prob

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

Michael Banck writes: > Couldn't you get the problematic outdated packages (I assume this is > the case if you're talking about [testing?] transitions) removed > temporarily? No, that would not solve the problem. The problem, as the subject line says, is that the buildds are not building my packa

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

Hi, On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > > Ryan Murray (w-b admin, DSA) is aware of the problem. > > I see that 1.5 week later, the pserver is still not responding. Is > Ryan on vacation? If so, can anyone else fix the problem for him? > This issue has been blocking

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > $ telnet cvs.debian.org cvspserver > Trying 192.25.206.10... > telnet: connect to address 192.25.206.10: Connection refused > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused > $ > > Without pserver running, wanna-build can't get its updates

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:45:11PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > I have requested an update to Packages-arch-specific for asis and other > packages, so that the buildds would try to build these packages on newly > supported architectures. > LaMont Jones made the requested changes on 2006-07-23 [1

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have requested an update to Packages-arch-specific for asis and other > packages, so that the buildds would try to build these packages on newly > supported architectures. > > LaMont Jones made the requested changes on 2006-07-23 [1]. Yesterday > (20

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Thursday 27 July 2006 15:55, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:06:25PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > AFAICT Packages-arch-specific is a quinn-diff [1] conffile, so probably > > bugreports should be filed against that package, but I'm not sure if > > autobuilders actu

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

Hi, On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:06:25PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > AFAICT Packages-arch-specific is a quinn-diff [1] conffile, so probably > bugreports should be filed against that package, but I'm not sure if > autobuilders actually use that package though. Also it seems like > dak/wanna-bu

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

On Thursday 27 July 2006 14:26, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > Hi Ludovic, > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:45:11PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > > I have requested an update to Packages-arch-specific for asis and other > > packages, so that the buildds would try to build these packages on newly > > suppo

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

Hi Ludovic, On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:45:11PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > I have requested an update to Packages-arch-specific for asis and other > packages, so that the buildds would try to build these packages on newly > supported architectures. > > LaMont Jones made the requested changes o

Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

I have requested an update to Packages-arch-specific for asis and other packages, so that the buildds would try to build these packages on newly supported architectures. LaMont Jones made the requested changes on 2006-07-23 [1]. Yesterday (2006-07-26), I uploaded asis again (2005-4), hoping to ha

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 09:56:22AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Two things: >> >> - control files are part of the source. w-b would have to download and >> unpack every source package to get that file. > > Exactly. > >> - control files can be

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 09:56:22AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Two things: > > - control files are part of the source. w-b would have to download and > unpack every source package to get that file. Exactly. > - control files can be auto generated during build (e.g. glibc) and > might no

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 05:53:25AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> The buildd package could just be a central hub where two or three >> knowlegable people sift through the bug reports and then distribute it >> to the affected/responsible person.

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 02:40:28PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: >> "Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> >There is no such general solution. See >> > >> >> That says: >>

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 02:40:28PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: > "Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >There is no such general solution. See > > > > That says: > >However, wanna-build does not look at the control f

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buildd admins can be reached; and lists.debia

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 05:53:25AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > The buildd package could just be a central hub where two or three > knowlegable people sift through the bug reports and then distribute it > to the affected/responsible person. Who would you suggest would do that? I know it's

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 06:31:56PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> Also, I would propose that a list, [EMAIL PROTECTED], or even better, a >> pseudo-package, buildd, be created for such issues. buildd would >> complement ftp.debian.org as a central pla

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 06:31:56PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > >> Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor > >> www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buil

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor >> www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buildd admins can be >> reached; and lists.debian.org does not have a "build

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor > www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buildd admins can be > reached; and lists.debian.org does not have a "buildd@" list. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I just committed

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > I will upload ~20 source packages in the next few weeks, adding > support for more architectures to each package. So I'm really looking > for a general solution and not one that only applies to asis. Why aren't those packages arch:

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

contact the buildd maintainers (actually the Packages-arch-specific maintainers [1]) when you add support for an architecture. > I notice that the buildds have successfully built the powerpc and > sparc packages, but seem to ignore the new architectures. I am > waiting for all architectures to

Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

, but seem to ignore the new architectures. I am waiting for all architectures to be rebuilt so that I can re-upload adacontrol, which build-depends on asis. In the mean time, adacontrol has a RC bug #378160 because of this problem. Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor