On Fri, Jan 02, 1998 at 03:14:31PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > No, the new package should be named similar to the upstream source but
> > the control file should contain these lines:
>
> > Conflicts: mdutils
> > Replaces: mdutils
> > Provides: mdutils
>
> But what if they currently have m
>>
>> Ok. I will try to isolate all the patches that affect these programs. Some
>> bugs, however, should be merged(see majordomo), and I don't know if a
>> non-developer(yet!) can do it.
> Everybody who has access to the bugtracking system can merge bugreports.
> And as you only need to have ma
On Fri, Jan 02, 1998 at 04:25:09AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> >> dbview closes 14563
> > Please do not close this. The package needs some investigation
> > and will be libc6'ed by that time. If you have patches to it, please
> > send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ok. I will try to isola
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I saw that bug report, to. Should the debian package still be name mdutils,
: but use the raidtools source? If not, how should the dependencies be set to
: make sure that someone upgrading will get raidtools, and have mdutils
: deselected.
See the packagi
| On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 8:55:02 PM
| Martin wrote about "My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give
me an account on master!"
> On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 02:46:11PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
>> YEs, that is the whole point. I need to be have an account on m
| On Friday, 2 January 98, at 12:15:19 AM
| Bruce wrote about "My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give
me an account on master!"
--- pacman-10.orig/board.cc
+++ pacman-10/board.cc
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
oldtemp=oldlist;
while (oldtemp) { //delete elements in the no
The memory doesn't necessarily go away when you free or delete an object,
unless you are running Electric Fence. Thus, it's perfectly possible
that the program would work sometimes, with some libraries.
By the way, the security folks said they got your new maintainer application
four days ago and
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 02:46:11PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> YEs, that is the whole point. I need to be have an account on master, and
> added to the keyring, etc, for this all to work. I am going to keep working
> on
This will be done, but everything needs some time.
> compiling for libc6,
> 18970 pacman_10-4.1_i386.deb Libc6! and doesn't segfault!
> There was an error in the source. A struct was referenced after it was freed.
> I am surprised that it worked on libc5. It should have segfaulted with that.
> Maybe that is a bug with libc5? I am in win right now,
On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam> | On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 3:17:38 PM | Boris wrote about
Adam> "My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give me an
Adam> account on master!" > On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam>
Adam> Adam>> wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb
| On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 3:17:38 PM
| Boris wrote about "My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give
me an account on master!"
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam>> wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb Libc6! 88624 xinetd_2.2.1-1_i
On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam> wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb Libc6! 88624 xinetd_2.2.1-1_i386.deb
Adam> Libc6! New upstream version
I think I already told you. Xinetd is not orphaned, I am going to
release the libc6 package in a few.
thks,
borik
__
Boris D. Beletsky
| On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 10:34:00 AM
| Guy wrote about "My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give me
an account on master!"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
> It's going to get rejected if his key isn'
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 07:34:00AM -0800, Guy Maor wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
>
> It's going to get rejected if his key isn't in the keyring.
He has already submitted his new-maintainer request. Please
wait until has been finished.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
It's going to get rejected if his key isn't in the keyring.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
13526 bulkmail_1.6-2.1_i386.deb Libc6!
34084 chord_3.6.1-1.1_i386.debLibc6!
9980dbview_1.0.3-3.1_i386.deb Libc6!
290268 defrag_0.70-3_i386.deb
25474 grmonitor_0.53-2.1_i386.deb Libc6!
40024 lurkftp_0.99-1.1_i386.deb
288158 majord
9980dbview_1.0.3-3.1_i386.deb libc6!
290268 defrag_0.70-3_i386.deb
40024 lurkftp_0.99-1.1_i386.deb
288158 majordomo_1.94.4-1.1_i386.deb
28442 mdutils_0.35-5.1_i386.deb Libc6!
69698 omirr_0.3-2_i386.debLibc6!
418514 tkdesk_1.0b4-2.1_i386.d
18 matches
Mail list logo
