> 18970 pacman_10-4.1_i386.deb Libc6! and doesn't segfault!
> There was an error in the source. A struct was referenced after it was freed.
> I am surprised that it worked on libc5. It should have segfaulted with that.
> Maybe that is a bug with libc5? I am in win right now, so don't have the
> source in front of me. I will get the problem code and post a follow up.
--- pacman-10.orig/board.cc
+++ pacman-10/board.cc
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
oldtemp=oldlist;
while (oldtemp) { //delete elements in the now previous sprite list
oldnext=oldtemp->next;
- delete oldnext;
+ delete oldtemp;
oldtemp=oldnext;
}
if (zero && oldlist) { //personal thingie used for debug, not useful
This is the patch that fixed the segfault with pacman. If you look, you'll
wonder how it worked with libc5. BTW, this is C++ code, if that makes a
difference.
It is hard to look at a penguin and get angry.
Adam Heath of Borg-Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] Join the H.323 effort. Email
http://www.debian.org - Get Your Own Linux! [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
http://wwp.mirabilis.com/3375265 - Page Me the word subscribe in the body.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
