Re: Conffiles (was: from / to /usr/: a summary)

2011-12-30 Thread Josh Triplett
Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Tanguy Ortolo schrieb: > > I think having the default configuration values written in a default > > configuration file under /usr is better than having them harcoded, since > > it makes it really easier to determine what these defaults are. But not > > shipping the user c

Re: Conffiles (was: from / to /usr/: a summary)

2011-12-30 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Tanguy Ortolo schrieb: > I think having the default configuration values written in a default > configuration file under /usr is better than having them harcoded, since > it makes it really easier to determine what these defaults are. But not > shipping the user configuration file, I do not kno

Re: Conffiles (was: from / to /usr/: a summary)

2011-12-30 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:00:23PM +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > I think having the default configuration values written in a default > configuration file under /usr is better than having them harcoded, since > it makes it really easier to determine what these defaults are. It's problematic if the

Conffiles (was: from / to /usr/: a summary)

2011-12-30 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez, 2011-12-30 14:22+0100: > I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc > should ship this files in the package in order to let the admin know > what package each file belongs to. Its very ugly to do a "dpkg -S > /etc/xxx" and get a no path found.