Description : single-pass C compiler for 16- and 32-bit x86/MIPS platforms
Smaller C is a simple single-pass C compiler with support for most of
C89 and C99. It targets 16- and 32-bit x86, and MIPS, on DOS,
Windows, Linux, and older versions of macOS.
.
Smaller C is primarily useful for building DOS
: Small embeddable C compiler backend
QBE is a compiler backend that aims to provide 70% of the performance
of industrial optimizing compilers in 10% of the code.
QBE fosters language innovation by offering a compact user-friendly
and performant backend. The size limit constrains QBE to focus on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Boddie
* Package name: shedskin
Version : 0.9.7
Upstream Author : Mark Dufour
* URL : https://shedskin.github.io/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python-to-C++ compiler designed to
: small C compiler
This is yet another small C compiler that implements most C11 features.
Even though it still probably falls into the "toy compilers" category
just
like other small compilers do, chibicc can compile several real-world
programs, including Git, SQLite, libpng and chib
: GPL
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
This native package will provide a build of gcc as a cross-compiler for
bare-metal SuperH devices as well as a build of Newlib to serve as the
ISO C standard library.
My primary motivation is to make
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Boulenguez
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gcc-or1k-elf
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gcc-or1k-elf
* License : GPL-3+
Description : GNU C compiler for the Open RISC 1000 processors
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathan McDowell
* Package name: gcc-xtensa-lx106
Version : 8.2.0-13+1
* URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : GNU C compiler for Xtensa lx106 core
Bare metal C cross
Package: wnpp
The LEGO Mindstorms RCX is a Hitachi microcontroller embedded into a
LEGO brick. This package lets you write programs in a C-like language
and download them to your RCX using the serial or USB infrared tower
included with the RCX.
I am seeking a new maintainer for this package beca
Description : Perl build helper to guess C++ compiler and flags
ExtUtils::CppGuess attempts to guess the system's C++ compiler that is
compatible with the C compiler that your perl was built with. It can
generate the necessary options to the Module::Build constructor or to
Ext
Description : The GNU C Compiler (cross-compiler for ARM targets)
This is the GNU C compiler, a fairly portable optimizing compiler
which supports multiple languages.
This package includes support for C and C++ on arm-none-eabi targets.
---
This package will be built using the gcc-4.4-source
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hector Oron
* Package name: gcc-4.3-armel
Version : 4.3
Upstream Author : many authors
* URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : The GNU C compiler (for cross-compiling)
This
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hector
* Package name: gcc-4.4-armel
Version : 4.4
Upstream Author : many authors
* URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : The GNU C compiler (for cross-compiling)
The GNU
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:39:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > - Should not be confused with the MingW32 compiler, which is a
> > > derivative of GCC 4.2 (I think the descriptions of both packages
> > > are clear enough, but suggestions welcome).
>
> Will it be useful to keep tha
it for all? What is different
> > with ming?
>
> Not being targeted at a debian system.
Notice we have a few examples of cross-compilers for non-debian arches
being built this way:
gcc-avr - The GNU C compiler (cross compiler for avr)
gcc-h8300-hms - The GNU C compiler (cross compiler f
: 4.4
> > * URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/
> > * License : GPL
> > Programming Lang: C
> > Description : The GNU C compiler (cross compiler for MingW32)
>
> How is this different to a cross compiler for armel, mips, mipsel etc.?
>
> Shouldn&#x
ing Lang: C
> Description : The GNU C compiler (cross compiler for MingW32)
How is this different to a cross compiler for armel, mips, mipsel etc.?
Shouldn't the binary package name be gcc-mingw32-linux-gnu or similar?
> Build of GCC for MingW32. This package includes support for C f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Millan
* Package name: gcc-mingw32
Version : 4.4
* URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : The GNU C compiler (cross compiler for MingW32)
Build of GCC for MingW32
ol buffers C compiler
Protocol buffers are a flexible, efficient, automated mechanism for
serializing structured data – think XML, but smaller, faster, and
simpler. You define how you want your data to be structured once, then
you can use special generated source code to easily write and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Potyra
* Package name: faucc
Version : 2009
Upstream Author : Volkmar Sieh
* URL : http://www.faumachine.org [1]
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : C compiler generating Intel code for
: http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : the portable C compiler
pcc is the continuation of the portable C compiler source included
in ancient Unix. It has been modernized to support C99 standards and
other great features. An advantage to using
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:35:52PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2006-07-03 09:04:39, schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> > su, 2006-07-02 kello 18:17 -0400, Jason Spiro kirjoitti:
> > > * Package name: openwatcom
> > > Description : C/C++ compiler and
> > > > Description : C/C++ compiler and IDE that produce efficient,
> > > > portable code
> > >
> > > What does it mean for a compiler to produce portable code?
> >
> > It produce executables for msdos, wfw311, win32, and linux.
>
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:35:52PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2006-07-03 09:04:39, schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> > su, 2006-07-02 kello 18:17 -0400, Jason Spiro kirjoitti:
> > > * Package name: openwatcom
> > > Description : C/C++ compiler and
Am 2006-07-03 09:04:39, schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> su, 2006-07-02 kello 18:17 -0400, Jason Spiro kirjoitti:
> > * Package name: openwatcom
> > Description : C/C++ compiler and IDE that produce efficient, portable
> > code
>
> What does it mean for a compil
ut
> soon) Upstream Author : an independent team of volunteer contributors
> * URL : http://www.openwatcom.org/
> * License : Sybase Open Watcom Public License 1.0 (it is
> OSI-approved) Description : C/C++ compiler and IDE that produce
But is it DFSG-approved?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> > >From DFSG FAQ Draft ( http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html ):
> This document mostly represents the opinion of the "DFSG revisionists",
> so it's hardly a surprise that supports the "we decide what is non-free"
> school of tought (sic).
I'm th
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Bullshit. The only criteria for defining freedom for the purposes of
> Debian *is* the DFSG.
Under a strict reading of the DFSG, I'm not sure how a license that
prohibits running the code would fail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Jul 03, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the DFSG was written by people. Additionally, most software
> licenses are written by people. It is no surprise that deciding which
> licenses actually comply with the DFSG is a process which requires
> people to make the decision.
Le 03-07-2006, Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> On the website it says it's a cross compiler, that is to say you can produce
> code for different target platforms on one host platform.
>
> Maybe you should change the description to something like "C/C++ cross
> compilers and IDE".
Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 03, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From DFSG FAQ Draft ( http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html ):
This document mostly represents the opinion of the "DFSG revisionists",
so it's hardly a surprise that supports the "we decide what is non-free"
school of
On Jul 03, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From DFSG FAQ Draft ( http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html ):
This document mostly represents the opinion of the "DFSG revisionists",
so it's hardly a surprise that supports the "we decide what is non-free"
school of tought.
--
ciao,
Ma
>From DFSG FAQ Draft ( http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html ):
Q: How can I tell if a license is a free software license, by Debian's
standards?
A: The process involves human judgement. The DFSG is an attempt to articulate
our criteria. But the DFSG is not a contract. This means that if yo
El lunes, 3 de julio de 2006 a las 10:06:56 +0200, Marco d'Itri escribía:
> It's this attitude of "DFSG is not restrictive enough, let's invent a
> few new restrictions which we like" that is screwing Debian (and our
> users).
You've got it backwards.
--
Jacobo Tarrío | http://jaco
On Jul 03, Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not the only criteria. People are very inventive when it comes to creating
> new software licenses with new restrictions which fit the letter of the DFSG
> because, hey, the DFSG say nothing about licenses that make you cut off a
> part of you
El lunes, 3 de julio de 2006 a las 09:41:18 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson
escribía:
> > I'd say that the freedom to use the program in any way I see fit is a
> > necessary freedom.
> Sorry, but the criteria for inclusion in main is the DFSG, not whatever
> ideas people might have of necessary fre
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:30:25AM +0200, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
> I'd say that the freedom to use the program in any way I see fit is a
> necessary freedom.
Sorry, but the criteria for inclusion in main is the DFSG, not whatever
ideas people might have of necessary freedoms :-)
/* Steinar */
--
El lunes, 3 de julio de 2006 a las 01:36:12 +0100, Matthew Garrett escribía:
> Ok, but it still needs to be modified. Are you suggesting that the
> freedom to produce a binary that can't be recompiled by anyone else is a
> necessary freedom?
I'd say that the freedom to use the program in any
> > What does it mean for a compiler to produce portable code?
> >
> Good question. I do not have personal experience with this, but I am
> told you can write your code once and then recompile it for a wide
> variety of platforms
On the website it says it's a cross compiler, that is to say you can
Le 03-07-2006, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> su, 2006-07-02 kello 18:17 -0400, Jason Spiro kirjoitti:
>> Description : C/C++ compiler and IDE that produce efficient, portable
>> code
>
> What does it mean for a compiler to produce portable code
Hello,
i did not understand. Are you saying that the compiler?
Openwatcom: open source multi platform c/c++ and fortran compiler.
Url: http://www.openwatcom.org
There that at one,
watcom c: c/c++ compiler
I hope, You don't mix with this.
Regards,
> Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>>
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
su, 2006-07-02 kello 18:17 -0400, Jason Spiro kirjoitti:
* Package name: openwatcom
Description : C/C++ compiler and IDE that produce efficient, portable code
What does it mean for a compiler to produce portable code?
Perhaps it is a Java compiler in
su, 2006-07-02 kello 18:17 -0400, Jason Spiro kirjoitti:
> * Package name: openwatcom
> Description : C/C++ compiler and IDE that produce efficient, portable
> code
What does it mean for a compiler to produce portable code?
--
One does not see anything until one sees i
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:36:12AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "use", like, for example, compile a piece of software. You don't
> > need to distribute openwatcom to anyone to fall within this clause.
>
> Ok, but it still needs to be modified. Are y
Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> Ok, but it still needs to be modified. Are you suggesting that the
> freedom to produce a binary that can't be recompiled by anyone else is a
> necessary freedom?
>
>
I haven't read the license, and I suggest asking on -legal if you want a
full analysis, but the gen
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not limited to modified versions
Yes it is. In fact, it seems to be limited to the modifications
themselves, rather than an entire modified source tree.
> it's for a period of time far exceeding that of the distribution.
Like Mozilla.
--
Matthe
Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # 1.4 "Deploy" means to use, sublicense or distribute Covered Code
> # other than for Your internal research and development (R&D) and/or
> # Personal Use, and includes without limitation, any and all internal
> # use or distribution of Covered Code withi
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:50:07PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:17:20PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote:
> [snip]
> > the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece
> > of software (thu
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:10:34AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece of
> > software (thus not "Personal Use"), you need to make the source of
> > openwatcom publicly available for 12 months.
Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece of
> software (thus not "Personal Use"), you need to make the source of
> openwatcom publicly available for 12 months.
What?
"You must make Source Code of all Your Deployed Modifications p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:17:20PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote:
[snip]
> the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece
> of software (thus not "Personal Use"), you need to make the
> source of openwatcom publicly a
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:17:20PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote:
> * Package name: openwatcom
> * License : Sybase Open Watcom Public License 1.0 (it is
> OSI-approved)
Oops... it looks like OSI smoked something especially bad this time,
I'm afraid. This license looks like someone took h
License 1.0 (it is OSI-approved)
Description : C/C++ compiler and IDE that produce efficient, portable code
Open Watcom includes a C/C++ IDE and a full set of command-line tools
for compilation, including the superb Watcom debugger. It emits
easy-to-understand errors and warnings when things
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:29:42AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:18:19PM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > IMHO, pari-gp-c or pari-gp2c could be better than 'gp2c' to avoid
> > this namespace pollution, at your option.
> Good catch, I will consider this option.
: GPL
> > Programming Lang: C
> > Description : PARI/GP GP to C compiler
>
> IMHO, pari-gp-c or pari-gp2c could be better than 'gp2c' to avoid
> this namespace pollution, at your option.
Good catch, I will consider this option. gp2c is the upstream sou
Description : PARI/GP GP to C compiler
PARI/GP is a widely used computer algebra system designed for fast
computations in number theory (factorizations, algebraic number theory,
elliptic curves...), but also contains a large number of other useful
functions to compute with mathematical enti
Hello Shawn,
* Shawn (Shu Xiang) Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-13 14:40]:
> Sorry. Could you let me know where I can get help for Debian user?
Take a look at http://lists.debian.org/users.html and choose
the user list in your preferred language.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECT
Sorry. Could you let me know where I can get help for Debian user?
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: C compiler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:26:40AM -0400, Shawn (Shu Xiang) Yu wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi,
Please don't hijack threads. Start a new thread by sending a new
message.
> I am new here. I just installed Debian on my system. When I try to compile a
> c code with gcc, I got error says "undefined reference
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 08:26 -0400, Shawn (Shu Xiang) Yu wrote:
Hello,
I am new here. I just installed Debian on my system. When I try to compile a
c code with gcc, I got error says "undefined reference to 'sin'". This is
the same code run on Windows.
Anyone know how to fix it.
From "man
Hello,
I am new here. I just installed Debian on my system. When I try to compile a
c code with gcc, I got error says "undefined reference to 'sin'". This is
the same code run on Windows.
Anyone know how to fix it.
Thanks.
Shawn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ragel
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Adrian Thurston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ragel.ca/ragel
* License : GPL
Description : finite state machine
On Sat, 2001-12-29 at 23:23, Andrew Mitchell wrote:
> * Package name: pnet
Hmm. This is a rather undescriptive name. How about something like
"dotgnu-pnet", or "dotgnu-dotnet", "dotgnu-net", or even
"dotgnu-portable-net"?
eption)
Description : DotGNU Portable.NET C# compiler & runtime
DotGNU Portable.NET is a project under the DotGNU meta-project. Its goal is to
build a suite of free software tools to build and execute Common Language
Infrastructure (CLI) applications. The initial target platform is GNU/Li
63 matches
Mail list logo
