Neil Williams, le Sun 17 May 2009 23:25:36 +0100, a écrit : > On Sun, 17 May 2009 23:33:29 +0200 > Robert Millan <rmh.debian....@aybabtu.com> wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Robert Millan <rmh.debian....@aybabtu.com> > > > > * Package name : gcc-mingw32 > > Version : 4.4 > > * URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/ > > * License : GPL > > Programming Lang: C > > Description : The GNU C compiler (cross compiler for MingW32) > > How is this different to a cross compiler for armel, mips, mipsel etc.? > > Shouldn't the binary package name be gcc-mingw32-linux-gnu or similar?
I guess you mean gcc-i686-pc-mingw32. This is not a cross-compiler to a debian system, but to the windows system. > > - Should not be confused with the MingW32 compiler, which is a > > derivative of GCC 4.2 (I think the descriptions of both packages > > are clear enough, but suggestions welcome). Will it be useful to keep that one? > > - Build will be made by reliing on the gcc-source package, which > > removes the need to add a separate .orig.tar.gz to the archive. > > If we have a method for one, why not use it for all? What is different > with ming? Not being targeted at a debian system. > How do we have a "source package" (the ITP) without source or relying > on source that is part of another package. just like gcj-4.4 works. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
