On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:39:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > - Should not be confused with the MingW32 compiler, which is a > > > derivative of GCC 4.2 (I think the descriptions of both packages > > > are clear enough, but suggestions welcome). > > Will it be useful to keep that one?
Well, that's not my call. I can think of a few reasons why it's desireable to have a build of GCC for compiling with MingW32 runtime/binutils, but as long as there's some use for the old MingW32 compiler, and there's someone willing to maintain it, I don't see why it'd be a problem to keep it. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
