On Jo, 16 aug 12, 07:40:52, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> Is this about using removable media to store the SSH private key to
> login to machines which only have the public key? That would be useful
> (but isn't that covered by existing PAM support?)
Well, by putting the SSH private key on a removabl
On 08/16/2012 11:42 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ):
>> [2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney)
>> [2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> What let you think this?
Carelessness in investigating (looked at
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html, noticed that the last news
entry was removal from testing and did not read closely enough to notice the
unstable r
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the
> > debian-devel@lists.debian.org list:
> > the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present.
>
> There is
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho (16/08/2012):
> There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is not
> "removed" in the sense that word is commonly used without qualifiers. (The
> proper way to describe what happened to the package is "removed from testing"
> -
> a release engineeri
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ):
> [2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney)
> [2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from unstable (Alexander Reichle-Schmehl)
>
> So I guess it must be
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the
> debian-devel@lists.debian.org list:
> the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present.
There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is no
Hello:
On 16/08/12 08:40, Neil Williams wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:01:33 +0200
Jerome Benoit wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
* URL : http://pam-ssh.sourc
Hello:
On 16/08/12 11:29, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 08/16/2012 09:01 AM, Jerome Benoit wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
* URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/
Hello:
On 16/08/12 10:39, Jon Dowland wrote:
It would be nice if your initial upload would resolve the multiple issues
that were the cause for the package removal, rather than simply reintroduce
them.
I am totally agree with you, and I am working on it.
I guess that you understand that I wante
On 08/16/2012 09:01 AM, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jerome Benoit
>
> * Package name: libpam-ssh
> Version : 1.97
> Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
> * URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/
> * License : BSD
> Programm
It would be nice if your initial upload would resolve the multiple issues
that were the cause for the package removal, rather than simply reintroduce
them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:01:33 +0200
Jerome Benoit wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jerome Benoit
>
> * Package name: libpam-ssh
> Version : 1.97
> Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
> * URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/
> * License : BS
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
* URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Authenticate using SSH keys
Thi
14 matches
Mail list logo
