On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the > > [email protected] list: > > the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present. > > There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is not > "removed" in the sense that word is commonly used without qualifiers. (The > proper way to describe what happened to the package is "removed from testing" > - > a release engineering action that doesn't imply any change in a package's > maintainership.) What let you think this? rmadison libpam-ssh libpam-ssh | 1.92-14 | squeeze | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc W: Archive maintenance is in progress; database inconsistencies are possible.
[Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:51:17 +0000] [ftpmaster: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl] Removed the following packages from unstable: libpam-ssh | 1.92-14 | source libpam-ssh | 1.92-14+b1 | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Closed bugs: 650644 Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
