On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ): > [2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney) > [2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from unstable (Alexander Reichle-Schmehl) > > So I guess it must be considered as removed.
Yes, you are right. Sorry for my careless reading of that page. In any case, no ambiguity, it seems. I don't think a package's presence in stable or oldstable alone is a problem. -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120816154232.gd2...@kukkavihko.kaijanaho.fi