On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:33:58AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> ?ukasz Ole? wrote:
> > 2010/6/10 Bastian Blank :
> >>> My personal preference would be to go with 4.0.
> >
> > I completely agree. Probably more people will use pvops kernel with
> > 4.0 instead 3.4, so hopefully it will be better t
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:55:58AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:33:58AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > ?ukasz Ole? wrote:
> > > 2010/6/10 Bastian Blank :
> > >>> My personal preference would be to go with 4.0.
> > >
> > > I completely agree. Probably more people wil
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:23:04PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > I'm currently thinking about which version of Xen supporting in Squeeze.
> > > There are two possibilities: 3.4 and 4.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, "James Harper" wrote:
> It would be nice if it could automatically detect xen kernels when you
> update-grub it though... or maybe that's what you were asking? Adding a
> custom section to the .d directory works but is a bit messy.
Yes, I applied a patch for that based on a g
>
> PS It would be nice if we could get Grub2 updated to boot Xen
kernels. My SE
> Linux Play Machine is offline right now because I messed up the Grub2
> configuration so badly that it won't even give me a boot menu.
>
I'm running grub from squeeze with a hand-compiled xen
4.0.1-rc. There are
Łukasz Oleś wrote:
> 2010/6/10 Bastian Blank :
>>> My personal preference would be to go with 4.0.
>
> I completely agree. Probably more people will use pvops kernel with
> 4.0 instead 3.4, so hopefully it will be better tested.
Hi Bastian,
I have been running Xen 4.0.0 on my laptop since you ma
6 matches
Mail list logo
