On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:55:58AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:33:58AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > ?ukasz Ole? wrote: > > > 2010/6/10 Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org>: > > >>> My personal preference would be to go with 4.0. > > > > > > I completely agree. Probably more people will use pvops kernel with > > > 4.0 instead 3.4, so hopefully it will be better tested. > > > > Hi Bastian, > > > > I have been running Xen 4.0.0 on my laptop since you made the Debian > > package, and there wasn't a single glitch (apart maybe the hibernate > > function which I don't really care about). Using an old version of Xen > > that already receives less attention from upstream isn't a bright idea. > > I believe that 4.0.1 will soon be released, which has many fixes. > > There's lots of new interesting features in 4.x too (like blktap2, which > > I believe you could re-add in the Debian package as the issue with > > OpenSSL was only the md5 thing, I suppose you saw it). My vote goes for > > 4.0.x. > > > > I'd vote for 4.0.x too. > 4.0.1 should be out this month. > > Xen 4.0 is the correct hypervisor to use with pvops dom0 kernels.. > there has been doubts if 3.4 series has all the required tweaks for pvops > dom0. >
Oh, and Novell SLES11 SP1 is shipping Xen 4.0 hypervisor, so that might help if there are bugs to debug/patch.. (They're not shipping a pvops dom0 kernel thought, their 2.6.32 dom0 kernel is the xenlinux variant based on their forward-ported patches). -- Pasi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100611065957.gq17...@reaktio.net
