Hi,
- "Joachim Wiedorn" wrote:
> Russell Coker wrote on 2010-06-05 22:30:
>
> > On Wed, 26 May 2010, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > > You're missing the point. The main selling point to management
> > > is that Linux is free. If they have to buy new backup software
> > > in order to accommod
Hi,
- "brian m. carlson" wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:07:22PM -0300, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
> wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva"
> >
> > * Package name: haskell-gnomevfs
> > Version : 0.11.0
> > Upstream Auth
Hi,
- "Stephen Powell" wrote:
> (blah blah blah blah)
Nobody cares if you are opposed to it. Unless you are offering to become
lilo upstream, it's going away.
William
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
Hi,
After some discussion about lilo on #debian-devel in IRC, it has pretty
much been determined that kernel sizes have crossed the line past where
lilo can reliably determine the payload size.
This bug *can* be fixed, but not without a significant rewrite of the
way that lilo's stage2 loader cod
- "Ben Hutchings" wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 17:58 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > But xen-tools have be removed from Squeeze, so I suppose it will
> be more difficult to create new
> > > installations (require much more work to replace the
> xen-create-image script).
> >
> > Well, I
Hello,
- "Ian Campbell" wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:29 +0100, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
> >
> > But xen-tools have be removed from Squeeze, so I suppose it will be
> > more difficult to create new installations (require much more work
> to
> > replace the xen-create-image script).
>
>
Hi,
- "Thomas Goirand" wrote:
> > But xen-tools have be removed from Squeeze, so I suppose it will be
> more difficult to create new
> > installations (require much more work to replace the
> xen-create-image script).
>
> Well, I've been maintaining dtc-xen since Lenny, and it does even mor
- "Josip Rodin" wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:23:07AM +0300, William Pitcock wrote:
> > I am looking into packaging xenner already as a backup plan if I
> cannot
> > manage to fix some major reentrancy problems in the Xen dom0 code
> > (Xensource 2
Hi,
- "Michael Tautschnig" wrote:
> First of all, I'd like to say a big THANKS to all the people
> maintaining Xen
> within (in of course also outside) Debian; you really saved us lots of
> money and
> energy (which is both, electrical and that personal one).
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > > 4) Wha
- "Gabor Gombas" wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:31:20PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > So the change has happened, lthough it took painfully long to get
> the
> > upstream Linux pv_ops framework in shape and all that.. and
> obviously
> > the pv_ops dom0 patches still need to get
- "Marc Haber" wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:55:27 +1100, Brian May
> wrote:
> >Like I said previously, I think dropping Xen support is a mistake
> because KVM
> >requires QEMU and QEMU seems to have a reputation of being insecure.
>
> Xen is unsupportable due to clueless upstream, who ha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock
* Package name: python-greenlet
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Bob Ippolito
* URL : http://undefined.org/python/#greenlet
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : lightweight in-process
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock
* Package name: python-eventlet
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Linden Research, Inc.
* URL : http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Eventlet
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : high
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 11:04 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Peter Miller:
>
> > I've been considering turning my fuzzy string compare function into a
> > library.
>
> I would certainly welcome that.
>
> Would you be willing to relicense it under a more permissive license,
> so that we don't hav
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 22:03 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> As some of you may already know, I have been doing a lot of package
> removals and QA work. One of the ones I ran across lately is
> OpenMotif. It has been orphaned since 2006 and has several bugs against
> it. However,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock
* Package name: polkadot
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : William Pitcock
* URL : http://polkadot.dereferenced.org/ (not yet up)
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : continuous
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:05 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 27. April 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
>
> As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are no means
> to
> enforce it (either pure
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 14:00 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> William Pitcock wrote:
> > neno...@petrie:~$ sudo yum -c ak-bootstrap.conf
> > --installroot=/home/nenolod/bootstraptest install centos-release yum
> > ak-bootstrap 100% |==
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 21:11 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> William Pitcock wrote:
> > I call bollocks here. I am using the version of yum in stable right now
> > to yield perfectly working virtual machine filesystems.
> >
> > How is it "broken" when it is work
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 16:25 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
> > Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm sorry that it took us so much time to make a working yum package,
> >> but we were quite overloaded with our work, taking over all the
> >> customers of another web hosting c
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:41 -0400, Matt Arnold wrote:
> No this means I take over the package try to cou ntact upstream etc
^^
THERE IS NO UPSTREAM ANYMORE. If you're not willing to become upstream
and wish to take it over, then we gai
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 16:22 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Nenolod: sorry for the other mail.
>
> William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 13:06 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:21 PM, William Pitcock
> >> wrote:
> >
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:05 -0400, Matt Arnold wrote:
> As the silent co-maintainer of lilo I believe I should now voice my
> thoughts on this
>
> I too believe that lilo should belive that lilo should be remove *at
> some point* but now is not the time. So I restate my willingness to
> take over
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 13:06 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:21 PM, William Pitcock
> wrote:
> > Lilo upstream is dead (no release in quite a while), but the lilo
> > maintainer has also been seen as saying in various mailing lists etc,
> > that s
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 10:52 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, William Pitcock said:
> >> The only way it is feasible to do so is to drop all of the Debian
> >> patches. Without this, upstream is not cooperative wi
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 22:20 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, William Pitcock said:
> > The only way it is feasible to do so is to drop all of the Debian
> > patches. Without this, upstream is not cooperative with us.
>
> Why is this?
See my other
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:46 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
>
> > I'm not sure where the original mail comes from, but IMO this should be
>
> From lilo package BTS which I was tracking for l10n purposes. So I
> just happened to notice William's answer to
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:19 +0200, Vincent Zweije wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:06:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> || On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:02:04PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov
> wrote:
>
> || > I use lilo, I like lilo.
> || > I don't like grub because it has unlogically config, u
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:06 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:02:04PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov
> wrote:
> > OS> I also share the feeling that a lot of people still uses LILO; if
> > OS> possible I do belive it should be kept.
> >
> > I use lilo, I like lilo.
> > I don't lik
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:40 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:26 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> >> Frans Pop wrote:
> >>> On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >>>> Quot
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:26 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >> Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
> >>> lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained ups
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:44 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Frans Pop writes:
>
> > On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> > I do not have time to manage the removal at this point, but it will
> >> > be gone by June.
> >
> > Has the package already been offered for a
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 15:09 +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Otavio Salvador may or may not have written...
>
> > Frans Pop writes:
> [snip]
> >> Anyone remember the fairly big upset when lilo was removed from testing
> >> around D-I Lenny Beta2?
>
> > I also share the feeling that a l
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 16:17 +0200, Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:03:10 +0800
> Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> >
> > > I also use lilo for /boot on LVM and I also clearly remember that
> > > was the major reason for the previous deb
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 21:30 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Oops... I strongly suggest providing a wrapper that matches netstat's
> format as closely as possible (even bug-for-bug if possible). Netstat
> is probably among the most used tools by sysadmins and programmers
> alike, both for software we di
Hi,
Is it 720p or 1080i or 1080p?
The following modeline makes my 720p 32" HDTV happy:
|SubSection "Display"
|Depth 24
|Modes "1680x1050"
|EndSubSection
William
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:04 -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> I have a Samsung 42" HD TV. It has a
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 23:56 +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Karl Ferdinand Ebert
>
> * Package name: tmux
> Version : 0.7
> Upstream Author : Nicholas Marriott
> * URL : http://sf.net/projects/tmux
> * License :
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 22:59 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:10:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:02:08AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What does this have over PowerDNS?
> > &g
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:42 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:02:08AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> >
> > What does this have over PowerDNS?
>
> Probably nothing, else that I am using it and packaging it for my own
> and thought t
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 03:19 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sylvain Rochet
>
>
> * Package name: mydns
> Version : 1.2.8.26
> Upstream Author : Howard Wilkinsin
> * URL : http://mydns.pl/
> * License : GPLv2
> Prog
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 23:35 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 01 mars 2009 à 22:31 +0100, Michelle Konzack a écrit :
> > I have 35 TEAC CD-Burner, 18 TraxData and a bunch of Yamaha.
> > All they are SCSI and not a singel one is working with wodim.
> >
> > The same goes for my 4 DVD burn
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 17:54 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 12:43 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joerg_Schilling
> >
> > I notice that Joerg's Wikipedia page is rather bare.
> >
> > Instead of spending time covering all the old arguments on this
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 12:38 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:56:38AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > William Pitcock wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2. I am not convinced that there is any legal issue with th
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 12:26 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> William Pitcock wrote:
>
> > > are some "Debian maintainers" that rather attack software authors instead
> > > of
> > > colaborating.
> >
> > It is impossible to collaborate whe
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 11:56 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> William Pitcock wrote:
>
> > > > > The fork distributed by Debian may however be called dubious:
> > > > >
> > > > > - The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 15:47 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Before Eduard Bloch made insane modifications, the code was GPLv2 and legal.
> Now the cude is undistributable because of modifications in the fork
> that are incompatible with the Copyright law.
>
> See my bug report from December 2006.
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 00:18 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The fork distributed by Debian may however be called dubious:
> > >
> > > - The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and thus may not be
> > > legally distr
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 16:28 -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at getting a video card, and I want to know what video card
> that has 3D acceleration to get. Normally I'd ask on -users but as the
> subject says I want to know what video cards will still have
> acceleration when
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 19:30 +0100, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
> > If it's GPLv2+ and doesn't depend on proprietary software, why it cannot
> > be in main?
> > Does it depend on proprietary things?
> >
> > Regards,
> As it is now, PlayOnLinux makes the user install Microsoft fonts
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 08:37 +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:00:22PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> > There is also questions concerning why you would want to package
> > something that has effectively a dead upstream, and many code flaws
> >
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 20:38 +0100, Rafael Belmonte wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> --- Please fill out the fields below. ---
>
>Package name: kmess2
> Version: 2.0alpha
> Upstream Author: Diederik van der Boor
>
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 07:56 +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> Rondal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> UnrealIRCd has many licensing and code-quality issues which would
> >> block it's inclusion in a Debian release.
> >
> > I admit that the sourcecode is not of the highest quality, but I do not
> > see wh
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 13:59 +0100, Rondal wrote:
> retitle 515134 ITP: ircservices-church -- IRC Services for IRC networks
> providing services like Nick- and ChanServ
>
> Hi,
>
> > See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=424844 .
> > Inclusion of ircservices in Debian may be pr
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:50 +0100, Rondal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > UnrealIRCd has many licensing and code-quality issues which would
> > block it's inclusion in a Debian release.
>
> I admit that the sourcecode is not of the highest quality, but I do not
> see where it will block inclusion into D
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 21:52 +0100, Stefan Becker wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Stefan Becker
>
>
> * Package name: ircservices
> Version : 5.1.14
> Upstream Author : Andrew Church
> * URL : http://www.ircservices.za.net/
> * License
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 21:37 +0100, Stefan Becker wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Stefan Becker
>
>
> * Package name: unrealircd
> Version : 3.2.7
> Upstream Author : Carsten Munk (stske...@unrealircd.com),
> Dominick Meglio (codema...@unre
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:43 +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:35:48 +0900
> Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > How about letting the person doing the installation write the labels
> > if they want to use LABEL and use UUID by default.
> >
> Or as a third option, put everything in LVM, in
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 14:09 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Mike Hommey dijo [Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:46:11AM +0100]:
> > > > A good option would be to use LABEL or UID instead. However I am not
> > > > sure if that has some drawbacks as well:
> > > >
> > > > - for uuid the system is less forgiving i
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 10:46 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 03:22:07AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 00:19 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > > In article <87bptnccj6@mid.deneb.enyo.de> you wrote:
> > > > Wha
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 00:19 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <87bptnccj6@mid.deneb.enyo.de> you wrote:
> > What needs to be done so that these two issues can be fixed?
> >
> > | Disk devices may change on reboot
>
> A good option would be to use LABEL or UID instead. However I am no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock
* Package name: mupen64plus
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : "Blight"
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/mupen64plus
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C/C++
Description : plugin-based N6
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 11:22 +1100, Andy Nicholson wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Andy Nicholson
>
> * Package name: Plumi
Package names need to be lowercase.
> Version : 0.2.3
> Upstream Author : Andy Nicholson
> * URL : http://plumi.org/
> * L
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock
* Package name: libdownload
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Aaron Griffin
* URL : http://www.archlinux.org/pacman
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : library for downloading files
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock
* Package name: pacman-package-manager
Version : 3.2.2
Upstream Author : Judd Vinet
* URL : http://www.archlinux.org/pacman
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : minimalist package
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:43 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> I guess we actually need to consider what the sections are good for.
> Asking in a random irc channel at least didn't reveal any real
> answers.
> So what about killing the concept of sections entirely ?
The primary user of section: is packa
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 23:04 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> The above article concerns the damage that Josselin's actions cause to the
> Debian project. D-d-a is not that different from other parts of Debian, bad
> behaviour in other forums also hurts the project.
I think that flame-war thre
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 20:42 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> You forgot xmms. It is still heavily used and there are no alternative
> for it. (It is just such a application as xv - very old but there are no
> alternative that completely replace it (in all facets).)
There's not?
There's at least 20 di
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 19:08 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 05 décembre 2008 à 21:43 -0600, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
> > > Alain Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >gsnes9x
> > > => visualboyadvance ?
> >
> > C'mon, there are at least 15 years between the two consoles.
> > And n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: appliancekit
Version : 0.131
Upstream Author : William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://appliancekit.systeminplace.net/
* License : ISC
Prog
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 02:19 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 29 November 2008 01:57, William Pitcock wrote:
> > What I propose is something more along the lines of Gentoo's "sunrise"
> > overlay... a repository that anyone can get upl
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 23:57 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 28 November 2008 22:42, William Pitcock wrote:
> > I think issues like these call for an unsupported repository outside of
> > Debian, but publicized within the community as an unofficial repo
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 20:51 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Can you advise me on how to get out of that dilemma?
>
> Stop trying to get qmail into Debian?
> or
> Take on upstream development of qmail and solve all the problems
> (whether qmail will then be recognisable compared to the existin
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 15:29 +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Montag, 10. November 2008, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
> > >
> > > http://screenshots.debian.net
> >
> > [
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 10:34 +, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> hi everyone,
>
> the current situation concerning firmware blobs and dfsg-freeness is a
> bit sad, among other things because there really isn't too much we can
> do about it in the short run. so how about some practical proposal that
> we
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 22:52 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> But regardless, Debian has promised that Debian is only free software.
Then why does Debian have non-free? Is that not part of Debian?
Does this mean that non-free should move to a third-party repo like
certain other repos out there
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:03 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Unfortunately, those who contribute to Debian must be dedicated to
> > ensuring future releases of Debian support the latest available
> > hardware at time of r
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:36 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 16:27 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:20 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 23:28 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > > > Would i
gt; list gets smaller between each release and not to add anything to
> > that list?
>
> I would be entirely happy with that. But I have just been told by
> William Pitcock that apparently we are required somehow to support new
> hardware with non-free software too. So it's not
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 13:30 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:59 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> > If we waited for a release to be 100% perfect, it will likely take
> > several more years. The good news is that the amount of inline firmware
>
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 10:38 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 15:22 +, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Thomas: your continued inaction and unwillingness to code an acceptable
> > solution to this issue, in spite of being aware of the problem since
> > at least 2004 -- over four
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dronebl-tools
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dronebl.org/doc/dronebl-tools
* License : BSD
Programming
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 18:30 +0300, root wrote:
> Package: lsb-base
> Version: 3.2-19
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.1
>
>
> Please investigate if files included in lsb-base conform to DFSG. A lincense
> change to GPL would be better suited for Debian.
>
> Policy / 2.1. The De
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 16:53 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you have both GRUB and LILO installed, there will be problems. That
> > is infact, a bug. They should Conflict with each other to ensure that
> > only one can
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:41 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Harrasing LILO users by silencing bugreports about problems[2] using
> it
> is the wrong approach. If LILO is officially unsupported by Debian
> (not
> only by kernel team and/or initramfs-tools maintainer) we should drop
> th
Hi,
Using latest initramfs-tools with lilo works for me, provided that the
new large-memory feature is enabled.
As maks says, user error applies here.
William
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:43 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi fellow developers,
I think it's time for libflash to go, yes.
William
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 22:13 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, All.
>
> I am maintainer of libflash[0] pakcage.
>
> This package is very old. and only an old Flash version is supported.
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: instantbird
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Florian Quèze and Quentin Castier
* URL : http://www.instantbird.com/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sigx
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Klaus Triendl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.assembla.com/spaces/sigx
* License : LGPL-2.1 or later
Program
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 09:38 -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > Launchpad can already be used as an openid /provider/ today, but I haven't
> > heard anything to indicate it will allow logins via other openid providers;
> > is more information available about this som
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 13:26 +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 02:55:25AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> > Yes. My webservers tend to use something like
> > /srv/www//{config,cgi-bin,htdocs,lib,logs,blah,blah}/ as the
> > normal layout. Exposing /srv/www as a document root
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 11:45 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:43:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> >
> > You can close Launchpad bugs in Ubuntu packages from Debian. The "LP:
> > ##"
> > syntax lets bugs get autoclosed when your package is synced to Debian,
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 19:18 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 16/07/2008 alle 17.46 -0500, William Pitcock ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:59 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I've packaged the new vers
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: audacious2-plugins
Version : 1.9.0+hg20080717
Upstream Author : William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tony Vroon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: audacious2
Version : 1.9.0+hg20080717
Upstream Author : William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tony Vroon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matti
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 00:57 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 16/07/2008 alle 17.46 -0500, William Pitcock ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:59 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I've packaged the new vers
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:59 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> Hi,
> I've packaged the new version of this library, the upstream author has
> changed the SONAME, and so I've changed the name of the lib and -data
> package, not changed the name of the -dev file because the old
> maintainer has ch
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 14:11 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> >
> > Without dom0, lenny will be unusable for several installations of mine
> > which presently run an ugly combination of etch's dom0 and l
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:35 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +03
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:42 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> I guess it was faster _now_, but they'll have to live with the forward
> porting pain for years more now..
While this is true, the patches still allow for Debian to ship Lenny
without a feature regression in Xen support.
William
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:12 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> > > Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the
> > > important Xen kernel
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
