Hi, ----- "Joachim Wiedorn" <ad_deb...@joonet.de> wrote:
> Russell Coker <russ...@coker.com.au> wrote on 2010-06-05 22:30: > > > On Wed, 26 May 2010, Stephen Powell <zlinux...@wowway.com> wrote: > > > You're missing the point. The main selling point to management > > > is that Linux is free. If they have to buy new backup software > > > in order to accommodate Linux' backup requirements, that will > > > kill it on the spot. Whatever boot loader I use must not > > > require new backup software or impose special backup > requirements. > > > > One of the advantages of Linux is that you are not forced to do > things the way > > that the distribution vendor packages it. > > > > You can take the last lilo package that gets uploaded, build it and > put it in > > your own apt repository, and then support it for your own users. > > I see that more people than thought still want to have or need LiLO. > Now > I have decided to start and reanimate the upstream development. > Everyone > is invited to join in this development. I'm working on LiLO version > 23. > > Shortly with more informations ... Have fun. When you have a release that actually has merit, it can be reconsidered for inclusion in Debian. In the meantime, the original plan continues. William -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/28336861.3901275860645697.javamail.r...@ifrit.dereferenced.org
