On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 22:52 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > But regardless, Debian has promised that Debian is only free software.
Then why does Debian have non-free? Is that not part of Debian? Does this mean that non-free should move to a third-party repo like certain other repos out there containing controversial things? If non-free is meant to be an opt-in part of Debian, then put the distributable firmware there and be done with it. William
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
