Idea for apt-get : getting source code instead getting binaries

2014-03-06 Thread Solal Rastier
Hello! I've an idea for a new apt-get package style : Developer side : -The developer create a ./install script in the source code. -The install script executes all commands necessary for install the software. Also, it getting dependancies, etc. -The developer create a tarball (.tar.bzip2) and re

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-03-03 Thread Solal Rastier
Le 3 mars 2014 à 13:59, forum::für::umläute a écrit : > assuming for a second that you are not trolling, > > On 2014-02-28 12:56, Solal Rastier wrote: >> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... >> > > hmm. > but since both "contrib" an

Re: "contrib" and "nonfree" distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez a écrit : > On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote: >> I not compare Debian with Windows. The FSF publishes a GNU/Linux freedom >> indicator. Debian is proprietary, sorry. > > Ah! The FSF website [1] says otherwise. The FSF

Re: "contrib" and "nonfree" distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
I not compare Debian with Windows. The FSF publishes a GNU/Linux freedom indicator. Debian is proprietary, sorry. Le 28 févr. 2014 à 18:24, Octavio Alvarez a écrit : > On 02/28/2014 05:18 AM, Solal Rastier wrote: >> 1. I'm not a troll >> 2. What is "top-post"?

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
That's not an answer. For users, that doesn't change anything. Le 28 févr. 2014 à 15:20, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Solal Rastier, le Fri 28 Feb 2014 12:56:00 +0100, a écrit : >> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... > > contrib and non-free are no

Re: "contrib" and "nonfree" distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
1. I'm not a troll 2. What is "top-post"? 3. Why I need stop? Le 28 févr. 2014 à 13:10, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > Le 28/02/2014 12:56, Solal Rastier a écrit : >> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... > > I applause this almost inconspicuous troll

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... Le 28 févr. 2014 à 12:46, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > Op vrijdag 28 februari 2014 12:42:39 schreef u: >> The FSF believe documentation need to be free, and that's true... > > It is true that it needs to be free, but their license just isn't f

contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/db2f0f4e-6f63-4246-a1cd-7a509f378...@me.com