Le 3 mars 2014 à 13:59, forum::für::umläute <zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at> a écrit :
> assuming for a second that you are not trolling, > > On 2014-02-28 12:56, Solal Rastier wrote: >> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... >> > > hmm. > but since both "contrib" and "non-free" are not part of Debian, how does > the existence of these sections lead to the conclusion that Debian is > proprietary. > > another random example: the existence of "ubuntu" does not mean, that > Debian is (say) "owned by canonical". > > fgsdfm > IOhannes > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53147ca0.1070...@umlaeute.mur.at > The installer recommend "contrib" and "nonfree"... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/143de185-efa2-491f-ae20-404e83cdd...@me.com
