Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez <alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org> a écrit :
> On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote: >> I not compare Debian with Windows. The FSF publishes a GNU/Linux freedom >> indicator. Debian is proprietary, sorry. > > Ah! The FSF website [1] says otherwise. The FSF website acknowledges > Debian as Free Software as in "conscientiously keeps nonfree software > out of the official Debian system", but it does not endorse it (by the > title of the Web page). > > [1] https://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html > > See? Get your facts straight. It's not the same "not to endorse" than to > "it is proprietary". Also, "non-free" is not the same as "proprietary". > > Windows is not even in the list because it *is* proprietary, flat. By > stating Debian is proprietary you are, in fact, comparing Debian > licensing with Windows licensing. You are saying that Debian is as > proprietary as Windows. > > Again, get your facts straight or nobody will care. > > And please (and this has nothing to do with Free or Open-Source Software > at all), next time, if I reply off-list to have a private conversation, > please be respectful and keep my response off-list. > > Finally, you still top-posted. Do you even understand what that is, at > least? > > Do you accept now that you behaved like a troll? > My mail client top-posting automtically. I don't compare Windows and Debian. Windows is proprietariest than Debian, but Debian isn't 100% free. Now, think about the utility of "contrib" and "nonfree". We must create free replacements to proprietary, not put proprietary in Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/6e00bfce-0973-4a8b-ac63-6ff7a8cd6...@me.com
