are those that leverage market opportunities faster than
their competitors. Guided by this principle, we support gaining a competitive
advantage by providing comprehensive IT support.
May I present what we can do for you?
Best regards
Ray Galt
mportant;">
http://email.cmail.joinf.com/c/eJwlzktuwyAUBdDVwMyIP_aAQRJ3HRV-gEMFdmtILe--KJ0e6X7AMhBHktjbhcUYcLKcMsM4N1QISjVh5D5_zFTPnClDlRQPJCkUlzL52tMWCewFP62SU1jEGGkEPXIFQvf0RGGauFRqFLhY2W1SEmd7nieB46rN5fQz5LQ-W9rWd9NhfViS2wYffkPuUznVVsk_kv1YcbkGeNW2l8G75iwy93J9vpJH4lZrv04l4o9O4Mr3WxnTRo0amfkPCptHtAPhone: +86-755-8695 6096 Fax: +86-755-8670 1827Mobile: +86-188 2284 8778
Skype: 1882284877
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)"
* Package name: lasem
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Emmanuel Pacaud
* URL : https://live.gnome.org/Lasem ;
http://blogs.gnome.org/emmanuel/category/lasem/
* License
Ian Jackson
> I have just received a review by a l10n team of a package of mine.
>
> The reviewer seems to be under the impression that there is something
> wrong with the computer speaking to the user in the first person.
I'm not active within the l10n-english reviews for some time (see
below)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: mono-uia-atspi
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C#
Description : At-spi UIA
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: strongwind
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Raul Jimenez
Bailey Kong
Jonatha Tai
Andreas Nilsson (Strongwind Logo)
* URL : http
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: atspiuiasource
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C#
Description : At-spi UIA source
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: at-spi-sharp
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C#
Description : C# bindings for at
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: at-spi-sharp
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C#
Description : C# bindings for at
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: atspiuiasource
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C#
Description : At-spi UIA source
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: uiadbus
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C#
Description : UiaDbus components of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: mono-uia-dbus
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C#
Description : UiaDbus
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: mono-uia-dbus
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C#
Description : UiaDbus components
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> GeoIP is a quite usefull library for geolocation.
> It has got a stable ABI/API and upstream is normaly very helpfull with
> patches and issues.
[...]
> Currently I see only three options:
> 1) upstream decides to open his build system
> 2) we move it to contrib with all c
2009 at 6:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ray Wang (07/08/2009):
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Ray Wang
>>
>>
>> * Package name : at-spi2-core
>> Version : 0.1.0
>> Upstream Author : Mike Gorse
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: at-spi2-atk
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Mike Gorse
Mark Doffman
* URL : https://projects.codethink.co.uk/index.php/p/at-spi2
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: at-spi2-core
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Mike Gorse
Mark Doffman
* URL : https://projects.codethink.co.uk/index.php/p/at-spi2
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: mono-uiaatkbridge
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C#
Description : Bridge between
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: mono-uiautomationwinforms
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C#
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang
* Package name: mono-uia
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C#
Description : Implementations of
satisfy it?) and not a current live problem.
Beware some of the "ported" CCs which include the trademark notice by
mistake and produced a licence which failed to follow DFSG - and some were
incompatible with other CC licences.
Hope that helps,
--
MJ Ray
My Opinion Only, see http:/
e check of debian-packaged drupal modules
(maybe through debconf option?);
3. something else.
Thanks,
--
MJ Ray (slef)
Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small
worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
(Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/e
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Posting a simple mail like "I can't predict why we might want to move
> > it, but it seems like a possibility we should leave open and yes,
> > ftp-master was a symbolic name, b
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> It's just the usual nit-picking on anybody who actually does anything to
> improve our infrastructure. [...]
It's also combined with the usual failure by many people who improve
our infrastructure to accept they wrote a confusing email (ftp-maste
gluck, merkel,
samosa and raff uncontactable (192.25.206.* network problem?)
I don't know anything more at this time, but wanted to push a small
message out so that others know it isn't just them and lists and IRC
are both still up, as far as I can see so far.
We now return you to your regula
policy server delay an incoming mail?
I suspect that sleeping in the perl would delay all incoming mail and
there's no access(5) response like Exim's delay, else I could do it
another way. How can it be done? (I want to increase the connection
cost to maybe-spammers of sending to my postfi
my appearance on
http://wiki.debian.org/DefaultMTA as that Postfix won't last.
Best wishes,
--
MJ Ray http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html tel:+44-844-4437-237 -
Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder,
consumer and workers co-operative member http://www.ttllp.
.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/11/msg00350.html to
"ML Discussion" if you're set up for editing it.
(BTW, your message-ids are @localhost - MTA config OK? ;-> )
Regards,
--
MJ Ray http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html tel:+44-844-4437-237 -
Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmi
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ti, 2007-10-23 kello 09:44 -0500, Steve Greenland kirjoitti:
> > But the license on the package itself doesn't make that restriction.
>
> If I have understood things correctly, in England (and the rest of the
> UK?) the copyright is owned by the crown and
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> That's mostly because -legal won't even say that the GPLv2 is DFSG-free,
> except in so far as it's explicitly listed as being DFSG-free.
Got a reference for that?
GPLv2 is a very frequently-suggested DFSG-free licences, has been the
subject of rep
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> and a vaguely interesting note is:
>
> * actually suing based on the license might be complicated by a
> choice of venue
>
> That you can argue the latter is analogous to a "fee" isn't really
> very interesting. That some people are c
spect looks pretty clever to me.
Hope that explains,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Experienced webmaster-developers for hire http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Also: statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, workers co-op.
Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.to
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > Please show where reading everything on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
> > given as a requirement for buildd maintainership.
>
> It seems common sense!
Huh? It seems common sense that
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An arm buildd maintainer not reading [EMAIL PROTECTED] is simply not
> doing his job as buildd maintainer.
Please show where reading everything on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
given as a requirement for buildd maintainership.
> You can't pretend to be the one
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:26:56PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > Should the ftpmasters, who have even less legal expertise,
>
> Judging by some of the nonsense that debian-legal is typically riddled with,
It's generally quite easy to spot the
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I suspect that if it were confined to Debian developers, this problem
> would be much reduced. Not eliminated, but reduced.
On what is that suspicion based?
I disagree. Some of the worst noiseboxes were DDs and some of the
best moderators weren't. Rest
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The d-l list has a problem which is shared by many Debian mailing
> lists (including debian-vote and debian-devel, and I'm sure it's not
> limited to them) which is that far too many people subscribe to the
> "last post wins" school of debate. People don't listen
David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Out of interest, if[0] that is saying that "we agree that anything isn't
> Sun's fault isn't Sun's fault" (which is fair enough) then that doesn't
> mention anything about any warranty that we might offer. For the large
> majority of the software we ship, we disc
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:42:27PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Exactly! It's not our fault, so why should we indemnify Sun against it?
>
> If it's not our fault, it's not under our control, and we *don't* need
>
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...] as we've just seen, people (both people from debian-legal and
> elsewhere) do seem to think that debian-legal is or ought to be where
> these decisions are taken.
Who did that? I must have missed a few posts.
FWIW, I think that debian-legal is a useful res
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:38:55PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Why do I need a case where some other application breaks?
> > The indemnification is for problems in the Operating System,
> > not only for Sun Java.
>
> Right. And w
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:41:27AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Cool. Where is this effect of sections 2(f)(i) and 14 disputed? I've
> > seen repeated claims that we're not liable for Sun's changes and downstream
> > cha
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No, it doesn't say that: it says "If in doubt, send mail to -legal". It
> doesn't say "if the license is doubtful", which is a different matter
> entirely.
We've been told "both James and Jeroen extensive contact with
Sun to ensure that the tricky clauses were
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> debian-legal, OTOH, claims that not only is the stock MIT/X11 licence
> 'non-free', but 'it is impractical to work with such software'.
I don't believe that those claims are consensual on debian-legal. The
MIT/X11 licence is frequently recommended by participant
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The guideline to ask debian-legal is not enforced by policy, but
> suggested by the Developer's Reference.
Please don't confuse things by introducing the DevRef to this.
An instruction to mail debian-legal about doubtful copyrights is in policy
s2.3. It is a
Anthony Towns
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:34:10PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > The package maintainer did not ask debian-legal (serious bug)=20
>
> That's mistaken. debian-legal is a useful source of advice, not a
> decision making body. That's precisely as it should be,
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In linux.debian.legal MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The package maintainer did not ask debian-legal (serious bug) and I'm
> They do not need to.
No, there's no absolute *need* to do that, or to follow any of the othe
Anthony Towns [...]
> And people are welcome to hold that opinion and speak about it all they
> like, but the way Debian makes the actual call on whether a license
> is suitable for distribution in non-free isn't based on who shouts the
> loudest on a mailing list, it's on the views of the archive
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It has happened in the past that the DPL asked a DD and a NM to make
> together a team to deal with a problematic license and to give together
> official Debian statements. [...]
Whatever happened to that? July's coming, bringing a new FDL draft,
if the news re
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Starting with "What is key for Debian" makes it sound like a policy
> statement on behalf of Debian, and "Just fix the license" could then be
> interpreted as a demand from Debian that Sun alter the license.
If Sun believe things from random people that easi
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...] I refer
> to Policy on a regular basis, but I don't think I've read the devref since I
> went through the NM queue. [...]
Then, as you know, Policy contains the instruction:
'When in doubt about a copyright, send mail to debian-legal@lists.debian.org'
a
Adam Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
>license agreement; and (f) you agree to defend and indemnify Sun
>and its licensors from and against any damages, costs, liabilities,
>settlement amounts and/or expenses (including attorneys' fees)
>incurred in connection with any claim, lawsui
Does anyone know the current status of maintainer Christoph Wegscheider?
Last maintainer uploads:
* qiv 2005-05-23 (sponsor Thomas Viehmann cc'd)
* potracegui 2005-05-01 (sponsor Bartosz Fenski cc'd)
* rsnapshot 2005-04-14 (I sponsored this)
Staging repository http://wegi.net/debian/ last modifie
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This one time, at band camp, Michael Banck said: [...]
> > Or rethink whether your issue needs posting at all.
>
> This is Jidanni you're talking to.
Please follow Michael Banck's advice before posting more
opaque comments that look like pure personal attacks.
-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "MJ Ray (Debian)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: irc2html.scm
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://mjr.towers.org.uk/software.html#other
* License
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> donated by Schlund + Parner where it is hosted as well. It is a
> DualCore Opteron and only runs this service for Debian users and
> developers.
I think/hope it should read "runs only this service".
Hope that helps,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://pe
Floris Bruynooghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...]
> But I've heard people claiming M-F-T is not a proper standard (despite
> not having an X- in the header) and even being broken. [...]
If I recall correctly, you can look in the IETF DRUMS working
group archive and you'll see it not becoming a proper st
Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So, if you feel a particular post was inappropriate / out-of-line bring
> it to the attention of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suggest using a bug report if it's important enough
to track. This is mentioned as an alternative on
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#maintena
Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, J=E9r=F4me Marant wrote:
> > I'd propose to revert this and clearly define what software is.
>
> I fully agree. The "Holier than Stallman" stuff is really getting
> ridiculous. After the firmware madeness, now the documentation madeness.
[...]
vi users who will just use vim-tiny?
Most "small vi" users don't seem to like vim, IME.
--
MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
doesn't.
My request was as suggested by
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
so please honour it.
Thanks,
--
MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 21-Dec-05, 16:11 (CST), MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Current unstable Installed-Size:
> > vim-tiny ranges from 696 to 1852 with a median of 898k.
> > nvi ranges from 560 to 1040 with a median of 648k
> &quo
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:11:14PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > - vim-tiny is on fewer platforms than nvi, which seems as
> > important as size or accuracy of emulation.
>
> Vim still runs in 16-bit DOS, and I think it even has a funct
o vim users over nvi, even without
>vim-runtime
> - vim can behave just like old vi (as nvi does), and will do so when
>invoked as "vi"
- vim-tiny is on fewer platforms than nvi, which seems as
important as size or accuracy of emulation.
--
MJ Ray - personal email,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> [...] Even if in the last two years it has become
> popular among some debian-legal@ contributors while the rest of the
> project was not looking [...]
Yes, the debian-legal cabal has been working in secret on its
public mailing list and has devised a plot
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:00:03 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> I'm using this package and I'd take it.
Thank you Christoph, it's yours.
Ray
--
"My golden rule of computing is reboot your system every morning."
Jon C.A. DeKeles, Technical Director, ZDNe
ld be addressed by someone
with more interest in xkeycaps than I have.
If you are interested in taking over this package, do let me know.
Ray
--
A Microsoft Certified System Engineer is to information technology as a
McDonalds Certified Food Specialist is to the culinary arts.
Michael Baca
> processing .
> Running aclocal ...
> aclocal: configure.in: 12: macro `AM_PATH_GTK' not found in library
You don't have a package installed which defines this macro. Install
libgtk2.0-dev (assuming you are using sarge or sid) or gnome-common (if you
are using a system that s
ement is not constant
`stdin' and `stdout' are variables, not compile time calculable constants;
see `info libc "standard streams"'.
HTH,
Ray
--
Frankly, I think anybody's a fool to put (Microsoft operating system
Windows) XP on their computer. It's like installing
On 2003-10-06 19:57:06 +0100 Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A logo is a graphical equivalent of a name.
I do not believe that, either. The logo is more of a creative work
than a word.
As to your example, you should note that the BSD licence does not
attempt to enforce the trademark its
e exim4 packages, so apologies if you've already
thoguht through these issues and come up with a cunning solution!
--
Ray Miller, Unix Systems Programmer & Team Leader
Systems Development & Support, Oxford University Computing Services
--- /etc/init.d/exim.ORI Mon Mar 4 23:
pdf. However, this package needs
> jadetex and that will not install.
Sounds like http://bugs.debian.org/183285 which has been fixed in 3.12-5
which made it into the archive during yesterday's dinstall run.
HTH,
Ray
--
TV is the worst of both worlds. It's not as good at words as
the documentation carefully and try if switching to a new compiler for your
kernel build helps.
HTH,
Ray
--
"[...] you can divide our industry into two kinds of people: those who want
to go work for a company to make it successful, and those who want to go
work for a successful company."
n)
> Shall I file a bug report against these packages (and probably others)?
I'd say go ahead. Please make sure the bug report contains detailed
information on what a package does wrong and how a maintainer can test
compliance when changing the package's workings.
Ray
--
ART A frien
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:58:10 -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> but if libfoo opaquely wraps libbar, why have libfoo-dev depend on
> libbar-dev?
How opaque is that opaque when considering the case of linking against a
library statically?
Ray
--
"The problem with the global village
ibution woody" and
try building it by hand in there, then do some traces on the ps2pdf
conversion.
HTH,
Ray
--
Do Microsoft's TCO calculations include TC of downtime?
ave the GS_DEVICE environment variable set?
HTH,
Ray
--
These days we're all supposed to believe that everyone's opinion is equally
valid, but sometimes you just have to stand up and say "Your opinion is
wrong, and here is why, in overwhelming detail."
http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2000/10/1/21448/7653
a link for it at the moment); would you
please consider getting the NOTICE updated along the lines of that phrasing
so as to make it clear that redistribution of OpenSSL-linked exim binaries
is allowed?
Ray
--
"Perhaps they spent some of the time writing the patent application. That
task w
on all machines.
>
> Advice please
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/debian-user-200203/msg03266.html
HTH,
Ray
--
The "free" in "free software" refers to freedom, not price; specifically,
that all computer users should have the freedom to study, change, and
redistribute t
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 14:51:04 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Indeed. Try recompiling the latest Evolution, for example.
Gnumeric is another; see my messages in the "New gnome-libs package build
against libpng3" thread on debian-gtk-gnome.
Ray
--
[...] computer source
anges (dropping/deprecating support for a lot of non-portable constructs
then in common use requiring e.g. compiling -DDIRENT_ILLEGAL_ACCESS) and a
a change of executable format (a.out -> ELF; big changes in how shared
libraries were built etc.).
Ray
--
We do not worry about Microsoft deve
the Debian-wide default compiler. I don't follow
debian-{gcc,toolchain} in detail, but it is my impression from those lists
that there is a concensus among the toolchain maintainers to switch to gcc
3.2 as the Debian-wide default compiler in sarge as soon as possible.
HTH,
Ray
--
Lately
nd
common C++ ABI for GNU/Linux and BSD usage. Unfortunately this means that
GCC 3.2 is incompatible with GCC 3.0 and GCC 3.1 releases."
(http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/c++-abi.html)
Ray
--
Pinky, Are You Pondering What I'm Pondering?
I think so Brain, but who wants to see Snow
t old packages with "apt-get autoclean".
If you just want to maintain a small mirror and generate your own Packages
files, then it's actually a good solution.
I haven't touched the code in over a year, but if anyone thinks this might
be a useful tool and wants to test it or take it over, let me know.
- Ray (duster on #debian)
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 18:03:14 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm asking here because the failure seems to be due to the "c++"
> compiler that doesn't recognize the "-Dsomething" option.
The toolchain was fubar on an IA64 build daemon host; see
http:
isn't an EU institution, but a Council of Europe one and whose
jurisdiction is therefore recognised by a lot more states than just EU
members:
http://www.coe.int/T/E/Communication_and_Research/Public_Relations/About_Council_of_Europe/CoE_Map_&_Members/
)
Ray
--
Hacker and proud.
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 16:19:47 -0400, James LewisMoss wrote:
> So can i have two sets of bin packages (xemacs-non-gnome and misc packages
> vs gnome bin packages) coming from the same source package?
Sure; see e.g. the vim source package for an (extreme?) example.
Ray
--
LEADERSHIP A f
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 19:31:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ccmalloc
To the best of my knowledge, there's no upstream for ccmalloc anymore. I'm
not using it myself, and there are several (possibly better) alternatives
available.
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 19:03:45 +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> > - x25tap
> > - kerneli crypto patches
> > - ReiserFS
> In that case ReiserFS is a really bad example, it might never be in 2.2
> and Linus said
x25tap
- kerneli crypto patches
- ReiserFS
and I'm sure there's quite a lot of stuff others use with 2.2 that hasn't
been ported to 2.4 yet.
Ray
--
LEADERSHIP A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with auto-
destructive imaginations in order to ensure that
there doesn't seem to be a download
version available yet, but I'm sure that with a little assistance from the
justice department these little things can be fixed.
Ray
--
Obsig: developing a new sig
ion. Unlike the old version, the new xfce is using a
free toolkit.
Ray
--
ART A friend of mine in Tulsa, Okla., when I was about eleven years old.
I'd be interested to hear from him. There are so many pseudos around taking
his name in vain.
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
g these to 'normal'.
> Package: gcc (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 59819 gcc_2.95.2-7(frozen): fails to compile itself on m68k
This one is more worrying.
Ray
--
PATRIOTISM A great British writer once said that if he had to
ms but at least it would
> catch dependency problems.
It would catch problems with the dependencies a package declares. But it's
no substitite for integration testing, part of which checks that the
declared dependencies of a package accurately reflect the real dependencies.
Ray
--
LEADERS
uot; is a property
of a release as a whole (the set of packages and their interdependencies,
ISOs, boot floppies and the upgrade path from the previous release) rather
than the sum of the stability of individual packages.
Ray
--
ART A friend of mine in Tulsa, Okla., when I was about eleven years
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 21:54:09 -0500, Brian White wrote:
> Is there anybody here using the Sangoma WANPIPE cards to do X.25?
X.25 isn't particularly popular under Linux, but people do use it. Your best
bet for information is probably the linux-x25@vger.rutgers.edu list.
HTH,
Ray
--
Te
ve?
If there isn't, I'd say just drop it.
Ray
--
Obsig: developing a new sig
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 13:59:16 +0100, Helen McCall wrote:
> What is needed is for someone to compile a list of all Debian Developers
> and their geographical addresses.
We're already doing that - see https://db.debian.org .
Ray
--
Cyberspace, a final frontier. These are the vo
e of the BTS by non-developers; so far I haven't seen it, and I
see no reason e.g. to prevent users from merging bug reports when they
notice something has been reported already.
Ray
--
LEADERSHIP A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with auto-
destructive imaginations in order to
first. A proper solution would
be to fix update-alternatives to handle this situation (if you write a
patch, please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Ray
--
Tevens ben ik van mening dat Nederland overdekt dient te worden.
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
