Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [...] In the very same post Joey correctly added: > It's now only marginally larger than nvi [...]
167% is a rather big margin, isn't it? > I asked Joey, as one of the installer maintainer, and for him the size > increase is not a problem. If it is a problem for the CD builders, they > can speak in this thread. If it is not a problem for these people, why > is it a problem for you? If one is honest and says that vim-tiny will replace nvi because the decision-makers prefer it, then that's fine, but this doesn't look like a technically-based decision. It doesn't seem supported by current data to claim that vim-tiny isn't a real size increase, or that this doesn't mean most vi users (both vim-fans and vim-haters) will want to install another vi besides the default one. Are there many vi users who will just use vim-tiny? Most "small vi" users don't seem to like vim, IME. -- MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
